Quantcast
Channel: Reviews — LowEndTalk

X4B Review (2020) - Stay away!!

$
0
0

Hello everyone!

Today, I'd like to tell you a few words about my experience on X4B. Based on the title, you kind of already assume how it'll end up being...

X4B in numbers:
Support: 1/10
DDoS Mitigation: 9/10
Network latency (in Europe: UK, Netherlands, Germany - tested on 3 different hosts): 3/10
Panel: 10/10
Ease of use: 3/10

Explanation:

Support:
If you ever experience any issues with their service, bugs on their end, or anything, just anything you'd have to contact their support over, they'll in 99.9% of the cases tell you to fu** off (in a nice way). They are rude and never willing to help. An hour of work is billed at $40 (or more) (if I remembered correctly). But the problem is not just that I don't know how to setup their service - I do! But they are trying to make me pay to fix bugs on their end... Unacceptable behavior. I sent them multiple traceroutes, pings, my provider name, they could've used their looking glass to fix the majority of the problems! Even after all that, they are telling me that I need to send them additional info but didn't even tell me what info... As an addition, WHATEVER I DO IS a PROBLEM WITH MY CONFIGURATION, NOT THEIRS! HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE? I'M NOT A BEGINNER WITH THIS STUFF, I'VE BEEN DOING THIS FOR OVER 2 YEARS!

DDoS Mitigation:
Excellent, no need to talk much on that part. It'll protect you from 99.9% of the attacks with pretty much no bypasses. It'll block everything from website attacks, DDoS attacks, any other UDP/TCP attacks on any OSI layer up to game exploits and MC bots... Just incredibly well made!

Network Latency:
Worst in the industry. Expect your latency to be at least 15ms higher, but maybe up to 40, with jumps from 30 (on origin)ms to 100+ms when connecting to X4B. And what did their support do about that? Take a guess:
A) Change routes and optimize ping further (as I'm routed to the UK instead of the Netherlands POP XD - from Serbia)
B) Contact their partners and peers to see what can they do to fix the problem
C) Tell me to fu** off and did absolutely nothing

Panel:
1000000/10. You can configure every single rule, do anything you'd want... From ReverseProxy configuration for L7 up to L4 rules. Anything that'll work on packet inspection filtering from WireShark, works on X4B. Possibilities are outstanding.

Please, due to the mentioned reasons, even tho the interface is great, as well as DDoS protection, it's not worth your money as you'll most likely end up with an incredible latency increase, with no further support from their team.

Screenshots of some of their other reviews:

Now, take a look at this autistic response:

Even tho I responded with so many details in the past:

Like wtf... Anyways, please let me know if you had such experience with them ;)


Contabo, from a customer of 6 months

$
0
0

⭐⭐⭐⭐✰/⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Contabo was and still is my first (and favorite) provider.

That's where my email, website, and a nextcloud instance are.
I got the VPS S SSD, on a day of promotion when they waived the setup cost for a VPS.
If it wasn't for that promotion I might've not bought a VPS from them.
Currently, I'm very happy with them.
(But somewhat looking to get dedicated cores)
I didn't get a loaded node like some people on this forum (but if those people were to call them or email them, they would've gotten transported to another unloaded node).
Their support is amazing, fast and really helpful. I just needed to send them an email to get changed to an AMD node and get the disk speeds unlocked.
They have telephone support, but I never needed to use it, as I didn't have any big issues like downtime or anything like this to solve.
Their SLA (uptime) with me so far is 100%.
My only complaint is that I only have a 200 Mbit port speed, but with the fact that the service is only 5 EUR p/m, I really can't complain.
Overall I'm pretty happy with them, and would defenedly recommend them to someone.

Here is the advertised specification:
4 vCPU Cores
8 GB RAM
200 GB SSD
200 Mbit/s Port (unmetered)

Here are my YABS resoults:

# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2020-12-29                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Wed 24 Mar 2021 09:37:44 AM CET

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Processor  : AMD EPYC 7282 16-Core Processor
CPU cores  : 4 @ 2799.998 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 7.8 GiB
Swap       : 4.0 GiB
Disk       : 197.2 GiB

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 5.29 MB/s     (1.3k) | 63.86 MB/s     (997)
Write      | 5.31 MB/s     (1.3k) | 64.27 MB/s    (1.0k)
Total      | 10.60 MB/s    (2.6k) | 128.13 MB/s   (2.0k)
           |                      |
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 525.02 MB/s   (1.0k) | 629.90 MB/s    (615)
Write      | 552.92 MB/s   (1.0k) | 671.86 MB/s    (656)
Total      | 1.07 GB/s     (2.1k) | 1.30 GB/s     (1.2k)
p
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                |                           |                 |
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 196 Mbits/sec   | 197 Mbits/sec
Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 198 Mbits/sec   | busy
WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 197 Mbits/sec   | 187 Mbits/sec
Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | 167 Mbits/sec   | 120 Mbits/sec
Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 189 Mbits/sec   | 191 Mbits/sec
Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 178 Mbits/sec   | 183 Mbits/sec
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 180 Mbits/sec   | 185 Mbits/sec
Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | busy            | 129 Mbits/sec

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                |                           |                 |
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 196 Mbits/sec   | 195 Mbits/sec
Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 196 Mbits/sec   | 196 Mbits/sec
WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 196 Mbits/sec   | 196 Mbits/sec
Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 186 Mbits/sec   | 190 Mbits/sec
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 178 Mbits/sec   | 184 Mbits/sec

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 765
Multi Core      | 2429
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/7096597

seriesn's new EntryBytes BOX benchmark.

$
0
0

As @seriesn doesn't just blabla about transparency but actually lives it I had an opportunity to test one of the EntryBytes VPSs. Thank you seriesn for providing it!
The results are based on a bit over 100 runs in the NL location.

Machine: amd64, Arch.: amd64, Model: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
OS, version: FreeBSD 12.2, Mem.: 3.986 GB
CPU - Cores: 2, Family/Model/Stepping: 6/79/1
Cache: 32K/32K L1d/L1i, 256K L2, 20M L3
Std. Flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat
          pse36 cflsh mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss sse3 pclmulqdq vmx ssse3 fma cx16
          pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline aes xsave osxsave
          avx f16c rdrnd hypervisor
Ext. Flags: fsgsbase tsc_adjust bmi1 hle avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid rtm rdseed
          adx smap umip syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm lahf_lm lzcnt
----- Processor and Memory -----

ProcMem SC [MB/s]: avg 256.6 - min 218.2 (85.0 %), max 269.0 (104.8 %)
ProcMem MC [MB/s]: avg 524.0 - min 445.4 (85.0 %), max 542.3 (103.5 %)

--- Disk - Buffered ---
Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 1026.30 - min 923.67 (90.0%), max 1145.51 (111.6%)
Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 4893.79 - min 3822.89 (78.1%), max 6521.84 (133.3%)
Read seq. [MB/s]:  avg 2597.72 - min 2434.42 (93.7%), max 3237.45 (124.6%)
Read rnd. [MB/s]:  avg 4341.32 - min 4010.14 (92.4%), max 4851.99 (111.8%)
--- Disk - Sync/Direct ---
Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 56.09 - min 31.98 (57.0%), max 84.03 (149.8%)
Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 142.21 - min 64.73 (45.5%), max 193.04 (135.7%)
Read seq. [MB/s]:  avg 1964.65 - min 1691.76 (86.1%), max 2147.82 (109.3%)
Read rnd. [MB/s]:  avg 234.02 - min 197.53 (84.4%), max 291.63 (124.6%)

--- Network ---
US LAX lax.download.datapacket.com
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 44.15 - min 0.00 (0.0%), max 47.99 (108.7%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 144.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 150.2 (103.8%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 150.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 789.1 (523.0%)

NO OSL speedtest.osl01.softlayer.com
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 203.52 - min 0.00 (0.0%), max 217.44 (106.8%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 24.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 31.9 (130.3%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 58.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 1264.2 (2178.1%)

US SJC speedtest.sjc01.softlayer.com
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 35.31 - min 0.00 (0.0%), max 43.60 (123.5%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 147.6 - min 145.2 (98.4%), max 150.5 (102.0%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 147.9 - min 145.2 (98.2%), max 150.6 (101.8%)

AU MEL speedtest.c1.mel1.dediserve.com
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 24.62 - min 0.00 (0.0%), max 26.73 (108.6%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 264.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 269.5 (101.8%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 264.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 272.3 (102.8%)

JP TOK speedtest.tokyo2.linode.com
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 24.96 - min 0.00 (0.0%), max 27.58 (110.5%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 240.3 - min 240.1 (99.9%), max 241.2 (100.4%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 255.4 - min 240.2 (94.0%), max 1211.0 (474.1%)

IT MIL speedtest.mil01.softlayer.com
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 222.84 - min 211.44 (94.9%), max 241.99 (108.6%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 23.1 - min 23.0 (99.4%), max 23.9 (103.3%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 66.9 - min 23.0 (34.4%), max 1471.0 (2197.9%)

FR PAR speedtest.par01.softlayer.com
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 445.23 - min 369.58 (83.0%), max 468.39 (105.2%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 12.8 - min 12.6 (98.3%), max 14.5 (113.1%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 52.4 - min 12.7 (24.2%), max 1355.5 (2585.6%)

SG SGP mirror.sg.leaseweb.net
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 36.76 - min 0.00 (0.0%), max 41.26 (112.2%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 158.6 - min 158.3 (99.8%), max 160.6 (101.2%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 159.5 - min 158.3 (99.2%), max 237.7 (149.0%)

BR SAO speedtest.sao01.softlayer.com
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 23.89 - min 0.00 (0.0%), max 31.93 (133.6%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 187.5 - min 184.9 (98.6%), max 190.7 (101.7%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 211.0 - min 184.9 (87.6%), max 1430.1 (677.7%)

IN CHN speedtest.che01.softlayer.com
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 30.47 - min 0.00 (0.0%), max 36.67 (120.3%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 167.6 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 188.1 (112.2%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 189.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 994.8 (526.1%)

GR UNK speedtest.ftp.otenet.gr
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 83.43 - min 0.00 (0.0%), max 144.71 (173.4%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 24.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 53.4 (217.5%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 30.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 616.1 (2001.6%)

US WDC mirror.wdc1.us.leaseweb.net
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 66.13 - min 0.00 (0.0%), max 73.08 (110.5%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 92.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 97.1 (105.0%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 92.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 97.1 (104.7%)

RU MOS speedtest.hostkey.ru
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 114.94 - min 0.00 (0.0%), max 136.74 (119.0%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 47.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 52.5 (111.2%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 48.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 69.4 (142.5%)

US DAL speedtest.dal05.softlayer.com
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 44.09 - min 0.00 (0.0%), max 54.41 (123.4%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 116.7 - min 116.3 (99.7%), max 118.9 (101.9%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 117.0 - min 116.3 (99.4%), max 135.6 (115.9%)

UK LON speedtest.lon02.softlayer.com
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 574.97 - min 381.26 (66.3%), max 699.18 (121.6%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 8.5 - min 8.4 (98.3%), max 8.8 (103.0%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 37.1 - min 8.5 (22.9%), max 1246.0 (3362.3%)

US NYC nyc.download.datapacket.com
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 72.46 - min 0.00 (0.0%), max 81.06 (111.9%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 84.6 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 89.0 (105.2%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 88.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 126.9 (144.2%)

RO BUC 185.183.99.8
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 142.72 - min 0.00 (0.0%), max 181.58 (127.2%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 33.4 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 38.8 (116.1%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 44.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 392.3 (881.0%)

CN_HK  mirror.hk.leaseweb.net
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 30.41 - min 0.00 (0.0%), max 35.65 (117.2%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 191.3 - min 190.7 (99.7%), max 191.4 (100.1%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 194.3 - min 190.7 (98.2%), max 207.5 (106.8%)

DE FRA fra.lg.core-backbone.com
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 607.65 - min 524.45 (86.3%), max 698.84 (115.0%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 7.7 - min 7.6 (98.6%), max 9.8 (127.1%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 7.7 - min 7.6 (98.5%), max 9.8 (127.0%)

First a meta-remark: In the network tests '0.0' means that some of the test run failed. That may or may not be the providers/products fault. Based on my observations it's usually either the network backends fault or, although rarely, the targets fault. The position of the 'avg' value on the 'min' - 'max' axis usually is a good indicator whether a failure happened only exceptionally or more or less frequently.

First processor & memory. These days one might be tempted to compare everything to a Ryzen 3000 or 5000. I'd like to correct that view which IMO is mistaken; I'm sometimes working with a 2450L dedi and have a 26xx v2 in my lab, and trust me, those machines are definitely not snails. Unless you know very well what you are doing and are doing it very often (having got a "feeling" for a box) -and- push the box really hard you won't see a lot of difference.

That's why I really like the 26xx v4. It's fast. Fast as in about 60% - 90% faster than a 24xx or a 26xx v2 - yet it's much cheaper to buy those machines than to buy Ryzen systems (which of course translates to lower VPS prices). When I had a talk with a provider who offers both, Ryzen (and Epyc) as well as 26xx v4 he confirmed what I had developed as an educated guess: the Ryzen systems are much, much more expensive.

Also a well chosen 26xx v4 isn't far behind an Epyc2. Or in other words: You get almost the performance of an Epyc but at much lower cost. So, seriesn made a smart choice for his EntryBytes systems. And (I almost wrote "of course") you have/get all the attractive flags, like AES, AVX2, popcount and even hypervisor from EntryBytes. Nice. I like that choice.

Next, the disk.I'll keep it short. Not at all bad but neither anything to write home about, but then this is a budget VPS. You get a solid SSD (Raided). If you want really fassst disks you'll need to go one level up to NexusBytes, at a cost difference of course.

Now to the network.

The bad news is that most targets shows failures. The good news is that most of those have only occasional hiccups as the 'avg' value clearly shows (it's usually quite close to 'max'). And I noticed that the network backend seems to be a bit optimized towards preferring the top locations. DE_FRA is a good example with about 600 Mb/s download speed. I personally prefer a more balanced approach but all in all I wouldn't complain, after all we are talking about products within the LET price range. That said, even the "exotic" target offer reasonable speed (which can't be said about every provider ...)

Summary/verdict: Well, I guess nobody expected something sh_tty from seriesn. Of bloody course even their budget line is decent. Whether you find it also attractive ("wanna buy!") probably will depend on mainly 2 factors, (a) price (which I don't know but assume is between nice and reasonable), and (b) the factors a benchmark can't capture; support is a great example, NexusBytes (and certainly EntryBytes too) offers almost incredible support.

BuyVM / Frantech review. 3 year customer.

$
0
0

Hello, I've been a customer of Frantech / BuyVM for about 3 years.

I've been through a lot at Frantech, starting out with a single VPS, canceling it and then eventually getting up to a small army of VPS's for various services for my company and projects.

From the start I was highly annoyed that most of my orders would get rejected because my IP location doesn't match my own. I run a hotspot for internet - it's not really my fault the provider of the hotspot can't bother to Geolocate properly.

With that aside, everything has been very smooth. Services have been progressively getting better with more features being added to their Stallion control panel over time. Admittedly I do not take advantage of the DDoS protected IP's so I can't comment directly about them - I just know a lot of folks use them with great success.

I gravitated towards BuyVM at first because of the humor, with humor like that you know it's gon' be good. Later on learning that they are very pro-free speech. There's no arbitrary non-legal related restrictions in the AUP / ToS. If it's legal and you're not causing a problem you're good. At first I thought this as just a nice bonus.

That was till a project I run came under some intense social media pressure where a bunch of folks who thought they're doing good for the mob attempted to cancel me at the provider level. "Is it legal? Yes? Is it causing abuse of Frantech? No? Cool." Glad to know there are providers out there that understand these situations.

From a product standpoint, the VPS's are fantastic for the price. I understand my 512 slices are fair share cpu - but they're not limited so I can still install updates and compile some quick software updates as needed. Reliability is generally pretty great. No Frantech is not a 5'9s provider, I'm OK with a few minutes of downtime on a saturday night because someone got mad at Fran again. In terms of getting what I pay for, I get exactly what I pay for.

I've only submitted a few support tickets that were answered promptly.

But.

I get a lot more than what I pay for, BuyVM has a wonderous community around it on IRC / Discord where everyone who can shares tips, tricks and tries to walk people through tasks and issues.

The staff of a company make or break it in a lot of case, and the staff at Frantech have been absolutely outstanding the entire time I've been around.

On a slightly more personal note, my own interactions with Fran:
In my free time I have been building my own small VPS host, and specifically chose to rack my first VPS hardware node in the same DC as Frantech. I did this because I know I will have customers that want more single thread speed for their VPS's and I can easily refer them to Frantech for that a few racks over.

When my server arrived at the DC the techs went to rack it but it had two left rails. Something I didn't check when I shipped it out. Fran said to grab a right rail from his rail stash. Absolutely wonderful.

Then they racked it, and it wasn't powering on. Fran told me to have them drop it off in his private cage as he was going into the DC that night, and that he'd take a look at it. He didn't have to do this at all, and offered it as he'd be there.

Upon showing up Fran noticed that UPS had damaged my server, even though it was packed in 4" of foam.

Taken apart, the power button ribbon connector was ripped off of the pcb.

Fran pulled a power button assembly off of a spare chassis of his and installed it on my own node so it could operate again. Even powered it on to just make sure it starts. That's some serious dedication to the craft. I've been going through some stuff lately and having Fran step up like that to help me out means a lot more than I can really express.

Contabo V*D*S benchmark and review - special

$
0
0

Front up: this is a special in more than one regard. Look at the insanely awesome disk performance! That's special no. 1.

A while ago Contabo contacted me and offered me access to a VDS, the "small" one ("VDS S") with 6 vCores. Hint/warning: their web site mentions "3 physical cores" of a 16-core AMD Epyc but in the usual hosting parlance one would mention vCores, so don't be mistaken. Now the second special point: the list price is €36.99/mo plus a €19.99 one time setup fee which falls away with an annual contract. "Wut?" I hear some ask, and you are right, this is way beyond $10/mo - but so is what you get. Let me explain. Like most of us I'm focused on the best quality within a certain (rather low) price frame, but at the same time like probably more than just a few of us I also need a couple of really reliable iron for business, projects, etc, and of course the first place I look at is LET.
Second, compare the VDS to a dedi and you'll see why (real) VDS can be quite attractive although they seem to be expensive.
For example I have a Xeon (older model) based dedi with 8 GB memory and an SSD that costs about the same as the Contabo VDS which has more memory, has a significantly higher performance, both single core and in total, and an insanely fast NVMe. Now, granted I'm a dedi freak but looking at what I get for my money with a dedi or a good quality Zen based VDS makes me think (and no, as long as I get physical cores Spectre & friends are no dedi advantage over the VDS).

For those of you who are still here, let's go at it:

6 dedicated Epyc vCores, 24(!) GB memory, and a 180 GB (insanely fast) NVMe based disk.Review based on over 500 benchmark runs.

Machine: amd64, Arch.: amd64, Model: AMD EPYC 7282 16-Core Processor             
OS, version: FreeBSD 12.2, Mem.: 23.982 GB
CPU - Cores: 6, Family/Model/Stepping: 23/49/0
Cache: 64K/64K L1d/L1i, 512K L2, 16M L3
Std. Flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat
          pse36 cflsh mmx fxsr sse sse2 htt sse3 pclmulqdq ssse3 fma cx16
          sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes xsave osxsave avx f16c rdrnd hypervisor
Ext. Flags: syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt pdpe1gb rdtscp lm lahf_lm cmp_legacy svm
          cr8_legacy lzcnt sse4a misalignsse 3dnowprefetch osvw topoext
          perfctr_core
----- Processor and Memory -----
ProcMem SC [MB/s]: avg 294.8 - min 291.7 (99.0 %), max 295.4 (100.2 %)
ProcMem MC [MB/s]: avg 939.4 - min 844.8 (89.9 %), max 1050.0 (111.8 %)

AES, hypervisor, etc. flags are available and the performance is, well, what one expects from an AMD Epyc, duh. And an amount of memory that frankly in my books belongs in dedi territory, not in virtual server territory. But it seems Contabo is dead serious about the 'D' in VDS ...
Also note the low spread. Less than 1% spread in single core confirms that this is a VDS (don't worry about the higher but still rather low spread in multi core; you'll see that even with a dedi)

Now on to the disk ... but be sure to fasten your seat belts!

--- Disk - Buffered ---
Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 3760.94 - min 2911.87 (77.4%), max 3884.18 (103.3%)
Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 6196.52 - min 5009.81 (80.8%), max 6912.47 (111.6%)
Read seq. [MB/s]:  avg 4672.86 - min 3771.61 (80.7%), max 5067.30 (108.4%)
Read rnd. [MB/s]:  avg 8723.46 - min 7932.94 (90.9%), max 9775.28 (112.1%)
--- Disk - Sync/Direct ---
Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 1138.40 - min 742.56 (65.2%), max 1270.34 (111.6%)
Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 1310.31 - min 655.94 (50.1%), max 1394.64 (106.4%)
Read seq. [MB/s]:  avg 4508.40 - min 3019.81 (67.0%), max 4678.94 (103.8%)
Read rnd. [MB/s]:  avg 9493.79 - min 7534.01 (79.4%), max 9813.65 (103.4%)

That's just insane! When I did what I always do after some first couple of runs that is, when I looked at the results I was sure that something was wrong with my software and quickly did a test run on my own rig with a Cardea PCIe 4 NVMe (the fastest thing I had in my hands so far). Nope. my software worked fine.
FYI: The fastest disk (NVMe) results I had seen so far with any kind of virtual server was in the 150 - 200 MB/s range with unbuffered sync sequential writing. This VDS's NVMe crosses over into 4 digits(!) territory! And I really rode it hard that disk and played almost dirtily with the parameters of my benchmark.
If you have a DB heavy project go for a Contabo VDS!. Bloody incredible that speed.

Let's look at the connectivity before I get horny again ...

--- Network ---
 US LAX lax.download.datapacket.com [F: 0]
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 42.1 - min 36.1 (85.7%), max 225.7 (535.7%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 154.2 - min 12.6 (8.2%), max 159.6 (103.5%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 155.2 - min 12.7 (8.2%), max 160.7 (103.5%)

NO OSL speedtest.osl01.softlayer.com [F: 0]
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 132.2 - min 78.7 (59.5%), max 157.3 (119.0%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 39.2 - min 34.6 (88.2%), max 39.4 (100.5%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 39.3 - min 34.6 (88.1%), max 39.5 (100.6%)

US SJC speedtest.sjc01.softlayer.com [F: 0]
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 32.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 41.0 (126.3%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 160.3 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 164.4 (102.6%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 162.4 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 170.8 (105.2%)

AU MEL speedtest.c1.mel1.dediserve.com [F: 0]
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 24.8 - min 22.5 (90.7%), max 27.6 (111.1%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 261.4 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 264.3 (101.1%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 261.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 266.8 (102.0%)

JP TOK speedtest.tokyo2.linode.com [F: 0]
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 22.3 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 27.6 (123.5%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 267.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 272.5 (102.0%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 269.4 - min 239.9 (89.1%), max 276.3 (102.6%)

IT MIL speedtest.mil01.softlayer.com [F: 0]
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 210.7 - min 174.6 (82.8%), max 224.3 (106.4%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 16.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 17.5 (109.6%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 16.1 - min 15.2 (94.3%), max 18.0 (111.6%)

FR PAR speedtest.par01.softlayer.com [F: 0]
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 214.8 - min 203.3 (94.7%), max 224.4 (104.5%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 13.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 15.7 (113.5%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 15.1 - min 12.9 (85.2%), max 49.6 (327.7%)

SG SGP mirror.sg.leaseweb.net [F: 0]
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 21.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 26.6 (126.8%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 278.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 354.7 (127.6%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 288.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 354.7 (122.8%)

BR SAO speedtest.sao01.softlayer.com [F: 0]
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 29.3 - min 23.0 (78.6%), max 31.7 (108.1%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 203.5 - min 201.0 (98.8%), max 203.6 (100.1%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 203.5 - min 201.0 (98.8%), max 203.9 (100.2%)

IN CHN speedtest.che01.softlayer.com [F: 0]
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 36.1 - min 26.2 (72.5%), max 41.4 (114.8%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 158.1 - min 150.7 (95.3%), max 160.9 (101.8%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 160.7 - min 154.4 (96.1%), max 166.3 (103.5%)

GR UNK speedtest.ftp.otenet.gr [F: 0]
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 80.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 135.4 (169.0%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 33.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 51.8 (156.1%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 33.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 52.1 (156.9%)

US WDC mirror.wdc1.us.leaseweb.net [F: 0]
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 61.5 - min 44.8 (72.9%), max 68.7 (111.8%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 99.3 - min 90.7 (91.4%), max 99.4 (100.1%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 99.8 - min 91.3 (91.5%), max 100.5 (100.7%)

RU MOS speedtest.hostkey.ru [F: 0]
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 121.3 - min 107.2 (88.4%), max 136.2 (112.3%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 44.2 - min 43.7 (99.0%), max 48.0 (108.7%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 48.2 - min 43.8 (90.8%), max 53.5 (111.0%)

US DAL speedtest.dal05.softlayer.com [F: 0]
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 48.6 - min 45.8 (94.3%), max 51.6 (106.1%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 123.3 - min 121.1 (98.2%), max 123.5 (100.2%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 125.4 - min 121.4 (96.8%), max 128.7 (102.6%)

UK LON speedtest.lon02.softlayer.com [F: 0]
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 186.8 - min 178.9 (95.7%), max 196.6 (105.2%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 22.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 22.9 (101.6%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 23.5 - min 22.4 (95.3%), max 26.1 (111.0%)

US NYC nyc.download.datapacket.com [F: 0]
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 65.7 - min 55.5 (84.4%), max 72.0 (109.5%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 95.4 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 97.1 (101.8%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 97.2 - min 92.4 (95.1%), max 108.7 (111.8%)

RO BUC 185.183.99.8 [F: 0]
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 139.6 - min 77.7 (55.6%), max 161.0 (115.3%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 39.3 - min 34.4 (87.6%), max 39.5 (100.6%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 39.7 - min 34.6 (87.2%), max 55.1 (138.8%)

CN_HK  mirror.hk.leaseweb.net [F: 0]
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 21.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 25.8 (118.5%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 266.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 323.1 (121.4%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 270.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 324.7 (119.9%)

DE FRA fra.lg.core-backbone.com [F: 0]
  DL [Mb/s]:      avg 239.6 - min 238.0 (99.3%), max 241.2 (100.7%)
  Ping [ms]:      avg 3.9 - min 3.8 (96.2%), max 4.0 (101.3%)
  Web ping [ms]:  avg 4.0 - min 3.8 (95.1%), max 4.1 (102.7%)

Remember the (constructive) criticism I received recently about the failure quote? Well, note the '[F:x]' at the end of each target line! It tells you how often a target host failed (download not possible or extremely slow (< ~ 2 Mb/s)).
Or, to me more precise, how often a failure occured beyond 5% of all runs. Why? Because there was something I didn't like since quite a while that I fixed in the new version of my result compiler: The internet is a "living" thing; sometimes a connection (as well as a target server) is a bit faster, sometimes it's a bit slower, and sometimes it simply has PMS. I didn't like that an occasional and damn normal hiccup made the results of a provider look worse than they actually were. And then it dawned on me: How do carriers often calculate their price? They cut out the top 5%, the highest peaks. So what works fine for carriers should work fine for me too, right. From this benchmark on the network results cut out occasional failures - but not results that are sh_tty beyond occasionally (up to 5% of runs).

As for the results, not really much to say other than decent, really decent, even nice. Particularly positive: most results 'avg' value is relatively close to 'max', except for a few targets which I know (and sometimes even chose for that reason) to be capricious or difficult (very PMSy).

Oh and btw, I'm very pleased to have learned that Contabo closely looked at my (former) benchmarks and finetuned some screws, particularly wrt network routes. And it shows. Kudos to Contabo for really listening to us and valuing our LET community. And of course thank you Contabo for providing a machine to test to me! Well noted, I myself "chose" the node via the usual lottery. I got a normal customer account and ordered the test system like everyone else, the only difference being that afterwards they take out the invoice (and for those mistrusting: NO, I have no system with Contabo, nor - as usual - did I get anything for free, other than the test system).

TL;DR Very nice system. Price way outside LET range but an attractive dedi alternative with an insanely fast NVMe from a provider who actually listens.

Anyone on Grafana Cloud free? How is your experience yet?

$
0
0

Hello LET,

since a while i'm looking for a free Grafana instance for personnal use. Better if it includes metrics db and more. Sure i can host myself as i meet all requirements and haven't a lot of needs.

I've checked on Grafana Cloud, haven't checked since their free offer got updated. It looks like an interesting offer and would be happy to read about your feedbacks.

Thank you for sharing :).

RackNerd Review

$
0
0

At first things were fantastic, great IO:

# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync;unlink test
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB, 1.0 GiB) copied, 3.56865 s, 301 MB/s

But then things got slow on March 31st.

# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB, 1.0 GiB) copied, 30.8056 s, 34.9 MB/s

RackNerd did some restarts and adjusted some things that got IO back up to 200MB/s.

# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync;unlink test
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB, 1.0 GiB) copied, 5.26892 s, 204 MB/s

But then today I checked my VPS to find it taking over 30 seconds to connect on SSH, finding that odd, I checked the IO to find:

# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync;unlink test
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB, 1.0 GiB) copied, 108.711 s, 9.9 MB/s

The response to RackNerd was not anything helpful other than to recreate the VPS with their template rather than using a Debian ISO (I want LUKS + LVM).

After a restart:

# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync;unlink test
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB, 1.0 GiB) copied, 80.995 s, 13.3 MB/s

However after a few minutes of support I noticed the IO improved.

# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync;unlink test
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB, 1.0 GiB) copied, 27.8868 s, 38.5 MB/s

At this point I'm at a loss. None of my VPS at Ramnode, Virmach, BuyVM have issues with IO like this. Is it really me using Debian with LUKS + LVM causing the poor IO? I was under the impression once I unlocked the LUKS it behaved the same as any other LVM EXT4 linux install. If I'm wrong I would like to learn how to improve things. The VPS has literally nothing on it, I had wireguard on March 20th and removed it recently. It's fully up to date with the latest Debian updates etc, no root login allowed on ssh, ssh keys only for my user to ssh with, fail2ban installed etc basics.

--Cody

Shockhosting review [EXPOSED]

$
0
0

5 months with their LA dedi, listen to this:

no matter what time it is, the same guy will answer my tickets within 30mins for mah dedicated
that's some real dedication ;)
do I need to say more?

AAA+++++++++++++++ amazing provider WOULD BUY AGAIN
My butt is urs mr shock

I'm so glad this account username does not point to me irl hahahhahahahaa


Contabo Singapore VDS and VPS benchmark & review

$
0
0

As I've already indicated, @contabo_m kindly provided me with pre-launch access to both a Singapore VPS and a VDS. In my view Contabo's starting a major Asia operation is a major thing because this is very good news (and IMO even a potential game changer) both for Asians and Europeans, also because Contabo has the muscles to bring some reason to that weird market.
Don't get me wrong, I like Asians; the problem is not the people but politics and large corporation games plus I guess, pardon me, some measure of sheer idiocy and/or arrogance.

Keep in mind that (meanwhile probably over) half of this planets population lives within a 2000 or so km radius circle around Singapore, yet for instance in China a dedi(!) with 10 Mb/s seems to be not dirt but gold; I've seen dedis even with 3 Mb/s offered at about $180/mo from reputable(?) providers! Similarly when renowned major universities provide an OS mirror with 1 Gb/s that's something to write home about in that region. But it's not just the "evil" Chinese but others too, e.g. Korea Telecom just basically not giving a damn about (not) peering with some of the global top 5 carriers. Has there been a lobotomization wave running through Korea Telecom's management? I mean, Korea is not a poor country like quite a few in Asia where poor connectivity might be forgivable

But although to me as a, well pampered it seems, European the image I got while having a closer look at that region and doing some research (e.g. to find and test reasonable test targets) is a rather sad one, I think many in that region will feel joy, and even quite a few Europeans will celebrate that finally they can get almost incredible 50+ Mb/s to and from Ozzyland or Kiwiland.

A very smart and good - and well performed - move, kudos Contabo!

Here is the results, first of the VDS, then the VPS.

Version 2.1.0a, (c) 2018+ jsg (->lowendtalk.com)
Machine: amd64, Arch.: amd64, Model: AMD EPYC 7282 16-Core Processor                
OS, version: FreeBSD 12.2, Mem.: 23.982 GB
CPU - Cores: 6, Family/Model/Stepping: 23/49/0
Cache: 64K/64K L1d/L1i, 512K L2, 16M L3
Std. Flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat
          pse36 cflsh mmx fxsr sse sse2 htt sse3 pclmulqdq ssse3 fma cx16
          sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes xsave osxsave avx f16c rdrnd hypervisor
Ext. Flags: syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt pdpe1gb rdtscp lm lahf_lm cmp_legacy svm
          cr8_legacy lzcnt sse4a misalignsse 3dnowprefetch osvw topoext
          perfctr_core

ProcMem SC [MB/s]: avg 344.0 - min 341.7 (99.3 %), max 345.8 (100.5 %)
ProcMem MA [MB/s]: avg 908.0 - min 801.9 (88.3 %), max 1011.9 (111.4 %)
ProcMem MB [MB/s]: avg 999.0 - min 912.2 (91.3 %), max 1160.0 (116.1 %)

As usual, Contabo isn't fooling around; you get a very nice server processor with decent memory. And, also as usual, you get all the commonly asked for flags like AES, etc.

But what's that new values 'MA' and 'MB' instead of the former 'MC'? It's feature of a new version of my benchmark program. 'MA' tells you, how fast a given job is done when using all cores, the job being exactly that done by 'SC' (single core) but spread over all available cores. MB on the other hand tells you how much performance you can get out of the system when pushing it with a much higher load. In the case of Epyc processors (and with plenty RAM) both values are pretty close to each other, which is what you want but older processors or ones with much less memory will show a more pronounced difference.

Btw, the above mentioned chinese provider (in the top 10 list, no less) offers most of his dedis based on 55xx and 56xx Xeons. Even the small Contabo VDS blows those dedis right out of the water.

Re. the VPS I'll not show the numbers. Simple reason: they are almost identical to those of the VDS, just with a bit more spread

Now on to the disk

--- Disk - Buffered ---
Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 5180.00 - min 3305.74 (63.8%), max 5388.47 (104.0%)
Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 7082.30 - min 6609.18 (93.3%), max 7660.51 (108.2%)
Read seq. [MB/s]:  avg 5153.73 - min 4944.69 (95.9%), max 5642.01 (109.5%)
Read rnd. [MB/s]:  avg 9574.30 - min 9134.78 (95.4%), max 9988.64 (104.3%)
--- Disk - Sync/Direct ---
Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 1246.29 - min 1106.11 (88.8%), max 1289.94 (103.5%)
Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 1391.59 - min 1303.51 (93.7%), max 1429.07 (102.7%)
Read seq. [MB/s]:  avg 5219.11 - min 5054.83 (96.9%), max 5568.88 (106.7%)
Read rnd. [MB/s]:  avg 9619.28 - min 9067.64 (94.3%), max 10177.16 (105.8%)

Yes, Contabo repeats the trick again in Singapore. Those NVMes are insanely fast. Also note the rather low spread which I expect to grow, albeit not by more than 15% once the nodes are populated. Keep in mind that I tested when the nodes were still hardly used.

So, on to the VPS disk

--- Disk - Buffered ---
Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 318.17 - min 302.88 (95.2%), max 334.09 (105.0%)
Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 1040.14 - min 928.32 (89.2%), max 1115.11 (107.2%)
Read seq. [MB/s]:  avg 2968.72 - min 972.99 (32.8%), max 4751.07 (160.0%)
Read rnd. [MB/s]:  avg 7016.10 - min 5035.19 (71.8%), max 10058.74 (143.4%)
--- Disk - Sync/Direct ---
Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 106.91 - min 103.67 (97.0%), max 119.31 (111.6%)
Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 109.02 - min 108.28 (99.3%), max 109.65 (100.6%)
Read seq. [MB/s]:  avg 2338.28 - min 912.74 (39.0%), max 4802.44 (205.4%)
Read rnd. [MB/s]:  avg 7757.60 - min 5209.71 (67.2%), max 10053.36 (129.6%)

Of course seeing those results right after the not from this planet NVMe values above one might be mislead to consider these numbers meager. They are not! In fact, those are really good results for an SSD. Unless you really, really need an ultra-fast disk e.g. for a serious DB server, I personally would choose (and love) the VPS with this SSD. Simple reason: price and the fact that the SSD comes damn close to and even surpasses quite a few NVMe VPSs from other providers.

Being at that: Are you insane, Contabo management, to offer a 4 vCPU, 8 GB mem. 200 GB seriously fast SSD VPS for €5 (+VAT if applicable) in Singapore? Obviously the answer is "yes, they have gone gaga at Contabo" ... and I LOVE it!

Finally, connectivity - and be prepared for a really long results list! Why? Because, hell, of course I looked for and tested plenty of new test targets, mainly asian ones. After all, from top class providers like Contabo I expect far more and better than a "me too" attempt; I expect something that really "unlocks" Asia. And then I push and test it ...

_(results based on close to 200 benchmark runs)

Sorry, Vanilla complained. Post too long. Network results in the next post ...
_

PHP-Friends.de vServer M SSD G3 AMD benchmark

$
0
0

Just got a trial server from @PHP_Friends and ran some benchmarks on it, here's the result:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2020-12-29                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Wed Apr 21 14:56:37 UTC 2021

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Processor  : AMD EPYC 7452 32-Core Processor
CPU cores  : 4 @ 2350.000 MHz
AES-NI     : _ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : _ Enabled
RAM        : 19.5 GiB
Swap       : 10.0 GiB
Disk       : 160.0 GiB

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 68.98 MB/s   (17.2k) | 98.11 MB/s    (1.5k)
Write      | 69.19 MB/s   (17.2k) | 98.62 MB/s    (1.5k)
Total      | 138.17 MB/s  (34.5k) | 196.73 MB/s   (3.0k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 133.38 MB/s    (260) | 140.29 MB/s    (137)
Write      | 140.46 MB/s    (274) | 149.64 MB/s    (146)
Total      | 273.85 MB/s    (534) | 289.94 MB/s    (283)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed     
                |                           |                 |                
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.09 Gbits/sec  | 939 Mbits/sec  
Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 1.08 Gbits/sec  | 927 Mbits/sec  
WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 1.09 Gbits/sec  | 942 Mbits/sec  
Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | 753 Mbits/sec   | 10.7 Mbits/sec 
Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 900 Mbits/sec  
Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 962 Mbits/sec   | 540 Mbits/sec  
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 813 Mbits/sec   | 144 Mbits/sec  
Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | busy            | 270 Mbits/sec  

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 704                           
Multi Core      | 2311                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/7527425

A bit worried about the disk performance, but everything else looks amazing for the price. I'll probably be buying from them in the near future!

First Impressions of GreenCloudVPS

$
0
0

I purchased their 10Gbps promo with the following specs for $60 a year:

- 8192MB RAM
- 4 cores
- 60GB SSD RAID-10
- IPv4: 1
- IPv6: /112
- Network: 10Gbps
- 8TB Bandwidth
- Linux OS
- SolusVM Control Panel
- Locations: Amsterdam, NL

and I've been very impressed.

Performance is great (especially at this price point):

root@ubuntu:~# curl -sL yabs.sh | bash
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2020-12-29                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Sat May  1 15:58:50 UTC 2021

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz
CPU cores  : 4 @ 2594.400 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM        : 7.8 GiB
Swap       : 2.0 GiB
Disk       : 57.0 GiB

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 164.65 MB/s  (41.1k) | 643.18 MB/s  (10.0k)
Write      | 165.08 MB/s  (41.2k) | 646.57 MB/s  (10.1k)
Total      | 329.74 MB/s  (82.4k) | 1.28 GB/s    (20.1k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 647.09 MB/s   (1.2k) | 659.37 MB/s    (643)
Write      | 681.47 MB/s   (1.3k) | 703.29 MB/s    (686)
Total      | 1.32 GB/s     (2.5k) | 1.36 GB/s     (1.3k)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed     
                |                           |                 |                
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 3.62 Gbits/sec  | 8.51 Gbits/sec 
Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 5.52 Gbits/sec  | 4.32 Gbits/sec 
WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 9.33 Gbits/sec  | 9.16 Gbits/sec 
Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | 924 Mbits/sec   | 497 Mbits/sec  
Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.90 Gbits/sec  | 2.23 Gbits/sec 
Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 996 Mbits/sec   | 1.80 Gbits/sec 
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.11 Gbits/sec  | 1.13 Gbits/sec 
Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | 245 Mbits/sec   | 907 Mbits/sec  

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 772                           
Multi Core      | 2627                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/7680501

and there's been 0% steal even when maxing out the cores which I've never seen before.

One snag I ran into was I got flagged for fraud when ordering, but their support quickly resolved that for me.

Overall impressions:

I've only had the service for a few days, but everything has been great so far.

10/10. @NDTN you have a great service :smiley:

Super bad service at OneProvider

$
0
0

I have ordered a 30$ dedicated server at OP on April 28, and it was delivered to me on May 3, but the time left show in server management is only 26 days left.
Super bad support!!!
And by the way, can anyone show me how to connect to the dedicated server when hostname can be changed whatever you like, and IP of the machine don't show anything but 6019?
Screencap: https://ibb.co/NVcvYbD
I don't have any assigned IPs, do I need to buy, because OP only sells 8 IPs at once.

My review of some providers I've used for the past years (BuyVM/RamNode/LiteServer/Hetzner/OVH)

$
0
0

Hi, this is my review/experience with random hosting providers that I've used over the past years (BuyVM/BuyShared/RamNode/LiteServer/Hetzner/OVH). I'll only be including ones that I have used for longer periods (at least a few years) so you can give a complete picture of what you might find when you settle down. And because "bad" experiences tend to stick more, I'll be focussing more on the roadblocks than on the good sides, but I'll try to also name some of the good things that I remember.

Disclaimer: This is my personal experience, and some of the things are from my memory. When I move provider I clear the history from my uptime monitors so I can see how the uptime at that specific provider is. If anything is incorrect/wrong, let me know and I'll correct it.

In no particular order;

BuyVM/BuyShared:
My first service with them (shared hosting - 1GB) dates back to May 2017. Since then I've had a few services with them. All of them in their Luxembourg/Lux location. So my experience will be with this location only.

Services used
BuyShared cPanel hosting, BuyShared reselling hosting (DA), BuyVM slice (512MB/1024MB/8GB), 2 slabs.

Support
My support tickets are pretty "specific" most of the time, the last few tickets were regarding their Path.net DDoS protection and how it would work in a specific set-up. So they are put under "Expert attention" - So Fran has to do them. And as far as I know, he's very busy. These tickets are answered within a few days. But that is to be expected because they are very specific. For general questions (e.g. if I may do portscans on other services that I rent, or unblocking port 25 for sending mail) the response time has been amazing. A few hours for the port blocking, and 2 minutes for the portscan question. Also, when I send a DM Fran almost instantly replies (haven't done that too much tho). Besides that, they have a Discord/Matrix/IRC server that is full of people willing to help (given that you have tried to find out things yourself, nobody likes someone that expects others to do the work for them). So the support is pretty great overall.

Network/Outages
This has been my "main" issue with the Lux location so far. From the start (my first services); I had a few shared hosting packages from BuyShared. And sometimes (not often, but it would cause >20 min outages sometimes if I don't remember incorrectly) there was an issue with a service (e.g. httpd/mysql/etc) on the shared hosting servers. This causes sites to throw 500 errors, or just not load. I have mixed feelings about this, because buyshared.net promises; "99.99% Network and Service Uptime". And due to these issues, that is not reached. But on the other side, we're talking about 8$/year packages (with a dedicated IP.. most providers cannot even offer that alone for 8$ a year). So I don't expect it to be great. Nonetheless, it was my experience. Of course, it was up most of the time, but enough for me to not trust it for production systems (who would for 8$ ;)).

Then, fast forward some time, I have been using BuyShared mainly and needed a VPS for a production service. It was tricky because I did not have any failover for this. It was a DirectAdmin server. I have been using it from 13/01/2020 until 01/02/2021. So about one year. This was an AMD Ryzen KVM 8GB (30$/m) VPS. The experience overall was pretty good, sometimes there was a small outage due to networking issues or something like it. Nothing major, but it is still pretty annoying. I also had some shared hosting from BuyShared running at the same time. And the issue that I've been seeing there seems to be fully unrelated to BuyVM in most cases. My BuyVM server was up pretty much always. But I eventually moved it away because the small downtimes every now and then were getting annoying.

Then we are at the present day, I have two services at BuyVM left; One is a HaProxy VM for one of my services with a DDoS protected IP. And one is a backup VM that has two slabs attached to it. First the one with the slabs; There was an issue a few weeks ago where the datacenter connected too many servers to one powerstrip, causing them to use too much power and shut down. This caused some issues on my backup VM because its storage was no longer readable/writable. Now because this VM is mainly used for backup storage I don't really mind. So I turned off the VM. And turned it back on when it worked again. But (if I'm not remembering incorrectly) it happened again shortly after. Overall this was about 8 hours of the server being unusable for its purpose. I turned it off again when it happened, and the next morning when I woke up, I noticed that Fran had given them a reboot (the VM's) to make sure that the storage attached back correctly. Now, this is an isolated incident, it was not their whole Lux location, just a few slab servers that happen to be connected to this powerstrip. But it did cause some work from my side (because I got Zabbix mails and had to check it) and a few hours of downtime. For me, it is just a backup server, but if I was using slabs for production stuff (a CDN or something) then I'd be pretty stressed about it.

And for my second service; My HaProxy load balancer, I have a Path.net protected IP. Overall it has been great. I do get a Hetrixtools notification every now and then (2 times a month or so for <2 min downtimes - Timeout). Also, a few days back, the subnet that my protected IP is on had an issue on Path's side where it would stop announcing due to an edge-case, causing 40 mins of downtime for the IP.

Besides those issues, the Lux location has been out of bandwidth for a while, so at some peak times it will congest, and it causes packet loss. They are working on it (still waiting on GTT) so I hope that will get better soon. I'm not sure how much impact it has on my VM's as Hetrixtools monitors from many locations, so I don't think it get's triggered with there is just packetloss.

Overall
Frantech/BuyVM/BuyShared (RIP - No longer sold) has been great, the provider is not expensive, the support is great, the Discord server is fun to read sometimes, and Fran seems to really care. I've seen him help people for long periods of time. And he won't kick you off for lame reasons - Very pro-privacy. They had an issue with carpet bombings a few months back, and Cloudflare wasn't able to help them, and instead of listening to the demands of the attackers, or paying up, they got in contact with a DDoS protection provider (Path) and got it sorted. They do everything they can to keep their services up and running and help their clients. For my taste, there is just a little bit too much risk to put production stuff at BuyVM when you do not have any automatic failover to another location as I've seen longer downtimes happen. I know 100% uptime is pretty much impossible, but the issues I've seen are too long to keep anything that must stay up with BuyVM. It is great for off-site things like backups, or redundant services.


RamNode
My first service with RamNode was a 128MB VPS, that I used as a VPN. It was invoiced in July 2015 ( I still renew it to this day ) - Just not as a VPN, because it's way too small, but as a "Bastion" server to connect to my other servers. All of my services have been in their NL location.

Services used:
VPS (OpenVZ & Openstack), cPanel reselling hosting.

Support
The support I've gotten at RamNode has been great almost every time - I cannot remember any bad experiences but the human mind isn't perfect. Most questions are answered within the hour, quicker in most cases. Their support is just top-notch. A few weeks ago I had an issue, I tried extending my partition (LVM) and I removed the SWAP partition and removed it from fstab. But afterward, the VM failed to boot. This is a VM that cannot easily have any off-site redundancy because they were client websites. So after it failed to boot, and the time reached 4am, I decided to restore a snapshot I made before starting. But it failed to recover every time. So I contact them, and within minutes I got a reply. After a little back/forth the restoration process was doing its thing. But it failed again (it took >30 mins every time). So support started the restoration process and I asked if they could monitor it. So they set a timer to check if the process was going. They checked if the server started up properly after the restore, and if the DirectAdmin panel was listening. I went to sleep and set an alarm for a few hours later (7 am) I woke up, opened my phone, and their latest reply to my ticket with a message that everything is working correctly and that everything is UP popped up on my screen. I turned it off and went to sleep. Just perfect support, and it hasn't declined over the years, it is still amazing.

Network/Outages
The uptime has been really good, sometimes services go years without any monitoring software reporting any downtime. And when downtime happens (a few weeks ago there was something wrong that causes some small network issues across all of my servers with them) it was resolved and caused <20 mins of downtime. The only notable downtime that I remember for the network was when they were attacked a few years back. During this time, they put everyone behind their remote DDoS protection provider to protect the network. But it did cause some issues.

I did have one "faulty" server or something like it. I ordered a new VPS to use as an "offsite" server for things like monitoring. And it had some issues. On the second day, it went down for 10 minutes (the host rebooted). And a day later I had some issues again where I could not ping it. Because I did not set-up anything I just requested a refund in credit so I can pay my other services, and moved that VM to another provider. It was easy to do because I did not yet set up anything on it. But from my experience, this is not the norm at all and seemed to be just that host node.

Overall
RamNode is my go-to provider for reliable servers, and I'd trust them with hosting production systems. They do not have live-failover from what I've seen, so you are still subject to the uptime of a specific host node, so if the motherboard of a server would die, then you'd be down. So I'm experimenting with providers that use SAN storage and redundant computing nodes. But if that is out of budget, then RamNode is perfect.


LiteServer
My first invoice with LiteServer was at 10/05/2017 for a small 128MB VPS. I'm currently using them mainly as a backup provider for some services that I have. For example, I have a bastion SSH proxy server at RamNode, and I have a backup at Liteserver in case RamNode would fail (because I would not be able to access anything without connecting to my OpenVPN server at OVH/Hetzner and manually finding the IP's).

Services used
VPS (mainly 128MB servers, and one storage VM for 3,75 EUR/m)

Support
The support has been good, I have not created many tickets, but they'd always reply quickly. I even created a ticket about a service that was sold out, waited a few hours, but then bought it at another provider because: It was cheaper, and I like it cheaper. And because it offered more for the same pricing (talking about BuyVM slabs here). So I closed the ticket. But they still replied to it (saying that they know I closed it) and that if I still needed it, they'd be able to provision it manually because I already had some services with them. So overall the support has been good, I cannot give any more specifics because I did not create many tickets.

Network/Outages
The network has been great in the years that I've been with them, there is rarely any downtime. They recently upgraded lots of their infrastructure, so it should be even better. I can only remember one "major" outage that lasted for, I think, an hour or so due to something being broken. This happened some time ago, and I think can no longer happen after their network changes. I also noticed some packetloss during mid-April. Freshping notified me a few times a day (I have it set to notify when even one request fails). And I could see the same packetloss from my connection. But this is no longer the case, and lasted for a few days. I'd trust them to host some production things without failover.

Overall
I have not used them for anything important, just for redundancy if another provider that I use would fail. But they have been great. Support is responsive, the network is good, and the servers are priced pretty low and work as expected.


- Body was too long to post so read the rest in my reply.

a list of LET icons

$
0
0

this has never been discussed, but i felt it necessary to make an LET hall of fame.

let us begin:

  • @cociu - obvious reasons.
  • @jar - once an admin, significant influence (fun fact i once sent him my address and told him to pull up when i was drunk and got perm banned afterwards)
  • @Francisco - goated.
  • @deank - only user with a troll tag (still waiting on mine...)
  • @Nekki - s/o nekki.
  • @William - smart dude who clearly doesn't give a fuck and has been around since like 1999.
  • @raindog308 - the dad of LET.
  • @jbiloh - possibly the most hated man on LET and particularly the LET copy cat, unbanned me after i got a perm ban so permanent goat status.
  • @jsg - smart as fuck, very antisocial, does not give a fuck, do not get into an argument with him.
  • @TimboJones - he's like LET's canadian uncle.
  • @Nyr - created an insanely popular script used by many, distributed on LET.
  • @FAT32 - smart guy that puts in way too much unpaid effort.
  • @dustinc - mans made a summer host, got fired, came back and made the most popular host currently on LET.
  • @WSS - king of shitposting.
  • @seriesn - goated, i can see him becoming @Francisco jr.

honorable mentions:

feel free to contribute to the hall of fame below.

VPSSLIM - More value than what I paid for (~6 months)

$
0
0

I got an @VPSSLIM OpenVZ Machine on Black Friday of 2020. I was a bit skeptical at first, as there were many people in the comments complaining of poor quality, but I believe that I got one of the best deals possible, at least for me. Perhaps I got lucky, I don't know.

For 1.5 Euro a month, I got the following specs:
2vCPU (E5-2640 v2)
4gb RAM
1gbps uplink (see benchmark, it's surprisingly good)
5tb bandwidth
150gb "ssd" (very slow, might not even be an ssd)

On paper, it sounds unbeatable, but I was definitely not holding my breath. However, I was pleasantly surprised.

Firstly, their uptime was impeccable, I didn't notice any complete outages, although there was a point where my VPS was incredibly slow, to the point where my website would hardly load. Aside from that one event, I did not observe any issues with the service.

Here are the YABS results, for those interested.

# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2020-12-29                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Sat May 22 20:10:19 EDT 2021

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2640 v2 @ 2.00GHz
CPU cores  : 2 @ 2299.926 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 4.0 GiB
Swap       : 0.0 KiB
Disk       : 147.5 GiB

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 796.00 KB/s    (199) | 14.32 MB/s     (223)
Write      | 829.00 KB/s    (207) | 14.95 MB/s     (233)
Total      | 1.62 MB/s      (406) | 29.28 MB/s     (456)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 26.37 MB/s      (51) | 22.61 MB/s      (22)
Write      | 28.18 MB/s      (55) | 24.97 MB/s      (24)
Total      | 54.55 MB/s     (106) | 47.58 MB/s      (46)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed     
                |                           |                 |                
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 932 Mbits/sec   | 854 Mbits/sec  
Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 946 Mbits/sec   | 873 Mbits/sec  
WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 931 Mbits/sec   | 913 Mbits/sec  
Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | 755 Mbits/sec   | 122 Mbits/sec  
Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 898 Mbits/sec   | 471 Mbits/sec  
Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 853 Mbits/sec   | 344 Mbits/sec  
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 568 Mbits/sec   | 315 Mbits/sec  
Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | 794 Mbits/sec   | 273 Mbits/sec  

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 463                           
Multi Core      | 825                           
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/8038076

As you can see, the disk speed is incredibly poor for an SSD. That was not a priority for me, so it was not an issue. However, it's certainly something to think about in case you need very fast storage.
Another point to notice is that the network speeds were very respectable. I'm not sure if it was advertised as 1gbps dedicated, or if it was advertised as shared, but once again, for the price, I have zero complaints. Another thing that really isn't a priority for me, but it's certainly not bad to have.

When it comes to support, I've only contacted them on one occasion. It was during the aforementioned period where the machine was unusably slow. Just like the speeds that day, their support was molasses slow. They replied almost 2 days later, long after the problem was resolved. The problem only lasted for a couple hours.

Overall, I have to say that it was definitely worth much more than what I paid for. Just make sure you get it on a discount, because it is not worth the normal 10 euros or whatever they charge normally.


Hostworld.uk 6 month review

$
0
0

I have two identical VPS's from @hostworld since last November (actually one even sooner but cancelled that one for a few months)

Specs are the following:

 Basic System Information:
 ---------------------------------
 Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v3 @ 2.60GHz
 CPU cores  : 4 @ 2599.994 MHz
 AES-NI     :  Enabled
 VM-x/AMD-V :  Disabled
 RAM        : 3.8 GiB
 Swap       : 2.0 GiB
 Disk       : 47.2 GiB

Uptime:

13:14:01 up 165 days, 12:48, 1 user, load average: 0.27, 0.78, 0.51

The only single downtime I can recall was on the 26th of March (which they sent an email notification as well) about some network issues. That lasted about 2 hours for me.

yabs result:

# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2020-12-29                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Wed 26 May 2021 01:03:02 PM CEST

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v3 @ 2.60GHz
CPU cores  : 4 @ 2599.994 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM        : 3.8 GiB
Swap       : 2.0 GiB
Disk       : 47.2 GiB

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 63.00 MB/s   (15.7k) | 372.90 MB/s   (5.8k)
Write      | 63.12 MB/s   (15.7k) | 374.87 MB/s   (5.8k)
Total      | 126.12 MB/s  (31.5k) | 747.78 MB/s  (11.6k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 301.08 MB/s    (588) | 223.02 MB/s    (217)
Write      | 317.08 MB/s    (619) | 237.88 MB/s    (232)
Total      | 618.17 MB/s   (1.2k) | 460.91 MB/s    (449)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed     
                |                           |                 |                
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 386 Mbits/sec   | 285 Mbits/sec  
Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 386 Mbits/sec   | 302 Mbits/sec  
WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 383 Mbits/sec   | 315 Mbits/sec  
Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | 223 Mbits/sec   | 79.1 Mbits/sec 
Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 345 Mbits/sec   | 260 Mbits/sec  
Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 271 Mbits/sec   | 251 Mbits/sec  
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 176 Mbits/sec   | 204 Mbits/sec  
Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | 182 Mbits/sec   | 136 Mbits/sec  

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 407                           
Multi Core      | 1255                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/8106497

I ran yabs two times, network speed remains almost the same. I'd expect a little better speed to Clouvider at least since both of my VPS's are in the UK as well. But since I don't have nothing too critical on them I won't complain too much (got a few websites, my personal email and rocketchat).

Now, lastly I'd like to talk about support. I love it! Really do. As the 3 times I have had to contact them I got my responses in 10 minutes. Even at 2AM in the morning UK time, that ticket was waiting for my reply as I had to take a nap real quick and when I answered back at 9am I got an prompt reply again. No idea if you guys ever sleep but you should.

Just in case the formatting of this thread isn't correct I'm sorry as I have no idea how Vanilla's "code" format actually works. I tried at least.

All in all, I'm happy with my service there. Thanks for the reliable VPS's @hostworld

how to benchmark and review windows vps?

$
0
0

hey there, i have a unused windows vps from cheapwindowsvps com
i never benchmarked or reviewed any vps before, so is there any tutorial/guideline for that?

or any pro reviewer wanna do a review on it? i paid for it, but it did not serve my purpose, so i feel reviewing it will make worth something out of my money.

looking for 100gb ssd vps under 5/month (btw i meant to put this in requests, whoops)

$
0
0

Not sure if this is realistic or not, but I'm looking for a vps with 100gb ssd, or at the very least, around 80gb for under $5 a month.

The SSD does not need to be super fast, but I would like it to have reasonable speed. No nvme required.

Here are the details of what I am looking for:

VZ Type:
KVM or OpenVZ

Number of Cores: 2 is fine, or really just 900+ geekbench v5
RAM: 2gb (preferably 3 or 4 if possible)
Disk Space: preferably 100gb+, although I can work with 80
Disk Type: SSD

Bandwidth: 2.5tb or more
Port Speed: 100mbs is fine

DDoS Protection: yes

Number of IPs: 1 ipv4

Location: any

Budget: Looking for under $5

Billing period: i need monthly

If I don't find anything I'll probably just hold off or bite the bullet and buy Contabo or something

Xeon vs Epyc and Ryzen, an excursion with a surprise

$
0
0

I have a couple of systems myself plus access to some more via a couple of friends, colleagues, and clients, and I occasionally look through the many benchmarks I've done.

That's how this started, or more precisely, it started when I looked over some result sets involving (or in LETese "involucrating") diverse processors and I suddenly noticed something strange: a "boring" Xeon with a performance number significantly above the rest, in particular above diverse cool and supposedly unbeatable, fast Zen based systems.

Huh?

A boring 14 nm Xeon beating a 7 nm Zen processor? Strange!

Well, some of the benchmarks were done with an "old" version (2.0.5), maybe that was a factor? I was sure, and I mean absolutely certain, that the relevant code hadn't changed, but hey, maybe I should carefully pick some known to be good Epyc and Ryzen VPS and run the current, and in particular the same benchmark version on all, just to exclude any even tiny doubt. And that's what I did.

I picked

and ran a dozen benchmark rounds on all 3, including the InceptionHosting / @InceptionHosting Xeon E-2278G based VPSs, using the most current version 2.1.0a.

Here are the results:

AMD EPYC 7282 16-Core Processor [4C, 8G]
   2.8 (3.2) GHz, L1 32Ki,32 Kd, L2 512K, L3 64M (4M/C, 2M/vC), 120W (3.75/vC)
ProcMem SC [MB/s]: avg 251.4 
ProcMem MA [MB/s]: avg 509.9 (202.82 % SC)
ProcMem MB [MB/s]: avg 634.3 (252.31 % SC)

______________________________________________________________________
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor [4C, 4G] 
   3.1 (4.3) GHz, L1 32Ki,32Kd,L2 512K, L3 64M (2.66/vC), 65W (2.7/vC)
ProcMem SC [MB/s]: avg 439.0 
ProcMem MA [MB/s]: avg 1109.2 (252.67 % SC)
ProcMem MB [MB/s]: avg 1157.5 (263.67 % SC)

______________________________________________________________________
presum. XEON E-2278 8 core Processor [2C, 1G]
   3.4 (4.6 to 5) GHz, L1 32Ki,32Kd, L2 256K, L3 16 M (1M/vC), 80W (5W/vC)
ProcMem SC [MB/s]: avg **495.6** 
ProcMem MA [MB/s]: avg 830.4 (167.55 % SC)
ProcMem MB [MB/s]: avg 814.1 (164.27 % SC)

Huh? A boring workstation Xeon with an onboard GPU (which makes it look toy-like in the eyes of many hardcore server pros) beats a Ryzen? How come? What's the explanation?
(Note that the Xeon system only had 1 GB memory which is less that the test set and the other systems)

Before diving in let me first quickly throw in my own workstation based on a Ryzen 4750G (just a single non virtualized run)

Ryzen 7 4750G Pro 8 core processor [16C, 48G]
  3.6 (4.4) GHz, L1  32Ki,32Kd, L2 512K, L3 8M (1M/C, 0.5M/vC), 65W (4W/vC)
[PM-SC] 457.14 MB/s
[PM-MA]   1.44 GB/s (315.9 % SC)
[PM-MB]   1.56 GB/s (341.3 % SC)

The 4750 having a slightly better single core performance than the Ryzen 3000 is easily explained by the 3000 being measured in a VM and also being slightly older. The significant performance difference in multi-core though brings up questions ...

But first let me provide a "legend".
The '[xC, yG]' shows the number of vCores seen by the benchmark (or any other) program as available. Note that each header also mentions the "real" cores (as opposed to SMT vCores). Also note that a providers VPS specification may have "vCore" or "vCPU" to mean pretty much whatever they please, so a VPS with say 4 vCores (sometimes sloppily called "cores") might actually mean anything between a fraction of a real vCore and 4 (full) vCores (and in very rare and exotic cases even physical cores. Contabos VSDs are an example).

The line right below each header lists (in this order) "base clock" "(turbo clock)", L1 (instruction and data) caches, L2 cache, L3 cache, and "(L3 cache per vcore)", plus the (official) TDP and the (official TDP per vcore).

At this point I could end by saying something like "Zen processors are not (always) faster than Xeons". 495.6 is more than 439, period, have a nice day.

But of course I won't. I'll try to explain more about it.

The first noteworthy observation is that the Xeon really leads only in single-core; in multi-core the Ryzens just blow it out of the water while the Epyc trails.
Let's look at that. First have a look at the number in pharantheses behind the MC performance number; it tells you how much more you can get done using multiple cores (relative to the single-core result). See it? Now the Epyc, while being slower than the Ryzens and the Xeon, doesn't look that bad anymore. In fact, it gets more work done when multi-threading than the Xeon (ca 200% vs ca 165%).

Plus, at least in data centers, there is often the question whether single-core performance is really that critical. After all, servers tend to have a certain type of workload, namely serving, which translates to "lots of waiting" (doing IO) where a high single core performance isn't worth a lot - but multi-core performance is. Why? Because it matches typical server loads well.
But there are of course also jobs that do need high performance; crypto is a good example. (Hint: SSL handshakes, in particular RSA ones, are very serious performance gobblers).

But the playing field is largely defined by the providers and those have to look at the cost factors. If you don't know the hosting world well my primer may be helpful.

Wrt processors TDP (and TDP per vCore) is probably the most important factor. That is one very significant point where Ryzen leads over Xeon which uses almost double the electrical power per vCore. This alone can decide whether one can make an attractively priced offer or not.
But things are always more complicated. In this field one factor that compensates for the higher power consumption of the Epyc is how many cores one can pack into a box (or a rack). Ryzens are single socket only but Epycs allow for 64 and even up to 128 cores (256 vCores!) in dual sockets in a box which translates to the cost of the whole box being spread over more cores (and hence VPSs) which boils down to lower cost per VPS. Plus it's cheaper in terms of switches, which, if professional ones are used, are considerable.
A small example: 12 cores per box vs 64 cores per box. With the smaller box one needs 6 switch ports while with the big box one just needs 1 (albeit a larger ~ more expensive one). Plus, there are dozens of boxes in a rack and if many switch ports are needed one will have to use 2 HU TOR switches.

In conclusion the three main points I see wrt intel vs AMD (in the DC) are these

  • Nope, AMD is not really light years ahead in performance. One reason for that is that intel processors are not bad; once they can produce them in 7 nm (or at least 10) the situation will change. The other reason I see is the fact that many, probably even most, VPS users do not really need the performance. For 80+% of use cases e.g. a E5-26xx v4 is plenty powerful enough. Oh and btw, the Ryzen is not meant for the DC but for the desktop.
  • Density. Where AMD indeed is significantly ahead is density and density price. AMD can offer a 64 core processor at a relatively attractive price. intel otoh can't offer that - now. But that will change.
  • TDP. that's a problem and a part of it is the fact that intels TDP numbers are worth next to nothing while AMD's TDP numbers are at least ballpark correct - and lower, which (see above) can be a killer factor in the DC, especially now with all the green initiatives.

But, and that could be a killer 'but': intel also has their own fabs and plenty. The day intel has a 7 nm process working and production ready with good yield will be a very bad day for Lisa Su/AMD.

Cheap Windows VPS CWVPS

$
0
0

Tony from CWVPS was generous to provide me with a trial. I selected the 8GB plan in Dallas location (I went through the normal sign up process just with a coupon code so this should be the same experience as someone signing up normally).

8 GB KVM (Unmetered)
3 Intel Xeon CPU Core @2.0 GHZ
8 GB Guaranteed Memory
120 GB Solid State Drive Space
Unmetered Bandwidth
1 Gbps Shared Network Port
Remote Desktop (Windows) or SSH Access (Linux)

https://cheapwindowsvps.com/

Geekbench 5:
Single core
181

Multicore
337

Average of:
https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/8147562
https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/8177611

CrystalDiskMark:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 8.0.1 x64 (C) 2007-2021 hiyohiyo
                                  Crystal Dew World: https://crystalmark.info/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 bytes/s [SATA/600 = 600,000,000 bytes/s]
* KB = 1000 bytes, KiB = 1024 bytes

[Read]
  SEQ    1MiB (Q=  8, T= 1):   150.338 MB/s [    143.4 IOPS] < 49497.94 us>
  SEQ    1MiB (Q=  1, T= 1):    61.449 MB/s [     58.6 IOPS] < 16936.92 us>
  RND    4KiB (Q= 32, T= 1):     3.072 MB/s [    750.0 IOPS] < 42394.44 us>
  RND    4KiB (Q=  1, T= 1):     0.822 MB/s [    200.7 IOPS] <  4933.94 us>

[Write]
  SEQ    1MiB (Q=  8, T= 1):   282.833 MB/s [    269.7 IOPS] < 29172.13 us>
  SEQ    1MiB (Q=  1, T= 1):   180.176 MB/s [    171.8 IOPS] <  5751.78 us>
  RND    4KiB (Q= 32, T= 1):     2.678 MB/s [    653.8 IOPS] < 46993.56 us>
  RND    4KiB (Q=  1, T= 1):     0.694 MB/s [    169.4 IOPS] <  5862.85 us>

Profile: Default
   Test: 1 GiB (x5) [C: 15% (18/120GiB)]
   Mode: [Admin]
   Time: Measure 5 sec / Interval 5 sec 
   Date: 2021/05/30 9:19:36
     OS: Windows Server 2016 Server Standard (full installation) [10.0 Build 14393] (x64)

Internet speed:
image

This result after a few attempts to get any numbers for the upload speed, it was giving blanks for upload speed.

https://www.speedtest.net/result/11516623353

Just wanted to put these numbers here in case anyone considering signing up so they have an idea of the performance. As for me, it is practically unusable for a Windows RDP so I won't be renewing this machine. Maybe usable as a headless Linux machine doing light work.

BuyVM / Frantech review. I've been a customer for 8+ years and have been kept happy.

$
0
0

It's rare for me write reviews, for several reasons. But I figure after eight years of services with BuyVM / Frantech, that I can comment on the service, company and support and it actually mean something.

Reviewing my invoices, it appears I was first invoiced on 02/07/2013. Quite some time ago! Over the years I've used BuyVM for many different things, everything from BuyShared (shared hosting) for some quick/simple static sites and email hosting to what they're known for: Virtual Servers.

As of writing this, I am currently using BuyVM for 13 different virtual servers, a few DDoS filtered IP addresses, and 3 bulk storage slabs. Both for personal use for my own projects, as well as hosting some business related items while we work on sorting out colocation stuff with owned hardware. Two of our three VPN locations are current served through BuyVM (Luxembourg and Vegas) as well as our shared hosting (Luxembourg). I'm running some high traffic servers including an Invidious instance (YouTube proxy front end for privacy, proxying requests for YT videos through the server so end user's IP never is logged with YT) as well as some high performance I2P routers (20tb~ mo sometimes of transfer). They've been incredibly supportive of pro-privacy network projects that I have, including running a Yggdrasil network node/peer, the I2P stuff, and they allow for Tor exits/relays.

In regards to the quality of their DDoS filtering, I've been lucky enough to not need it recently, but still pay for the filtered IPs, however in the past they've easily mitigated a 50Gbit~ attack on a forum I was hosting with them and helped me keep it online even after others were determined to see it go down. The $3/mo for the filtered IP seems more than worth it. I'm sure they've mitigated larger attacks for other clients and probably do many smaller mitigations daily, but I know that old forum used to get slammed occasionally and they were a tremendous help in keeping it online.

It's all unmanaged services, so I try to exhaust all options before I open a ticket with them. I always open my tickets under, "Low Priority" and am impressed with the quick response time. Sometimes it's 10 minutes or less at strange hours of the night and it just blows me away. Some of the recent tickets I have submitted include:

  • A question about IP SWIP and their ability to do it. They can / will.
  • Asking if port 25 was blocked at the network level on their end. It was, and I got whitelisted so that my server(s) can send email if needed.
  • SNMP monitoring over a DDoS filtered IP question which was answered promptly. (Requests from the monitoring server were getting blocked by the filtering, but that is no longer an issue)

I don't expect quick support on unmanaged services, if I hear back in 16-24 hours, to me, that is 'good' (for cheap, unmanaged services) but a 15-30 minute response is common, with an hour or so at most during peak times being normal. That's incredible. If it's not Francisco himself answering a ticket then it's someone just as capable to respond to whatever my question is answering.

What really prompted this review is the features they've added to their in-house VPS control panel recently. The DDoS Filtered IP Firewall ( manage allow/deny blocking rules from IP's or subnets for whatever ports you specify) as well as the integration of server graphs. The fact that they seemingly are always trying to better their product, whether it be from the service itself (storage slabs, adding transit to locations, etc) or just adding features to their in-house stuff in the Stallion control panel (like the firewall management and graphs) just shows that they're willing to spend time and money improving upon a service that is already solid. They could have done nothing and likely retained all their existing customers and continued to gain new ones but they add features that add value to what they're already offering with no price increase to the end user. Heck yeah.

I was trying to figure out if this was a 'pro' or a 'con' about the service, but the more I think about it, the more I see it as a 'pro'. Sometimes their servers are out of stock. But, I find that on the first of the month or after the 7th of the month ( I assume after unpaid / terminated services get added back to stock) that you'll have no trouble finding a server. Instead of over allocating resources to accommodate service requests, they simply wait until the resources are actually available. At the lower priced scale that they offer services at, that is rarely seen. So in a sense, while a mild inconvenience at times, it's actually a positive thing that they do.

I'm pretty sure the hardware nodes are the same in each location so things like disk and CPU performance is consistent regardless of location (Consistently good) so there isn't any noteable variance in performance. I expect and receive the same performance in all locations. Network quality in all three locations are comparable, I've not had any major issues but haven't done any testing with the purpose to compare the three locations but can if anyone is interested enough.

All in all, I've got to give them a 10/10. It seems the features they were standard and unique to them 8 years ago when I signed up are features other providers began to implement later. They seem to be ahead of the curve in many key areas in the Virtual Server industry. The company seems to be ran by a small but dedicated team of people who actually care about the service and possess the skills and know-how to handle any issue that they may encounter. They have an IRC channel (if you're old, like me) or a Discord (if you can stand that) that are integrated and it's a good source of entertainment but also an informal way to ask questions.

Positive experience with hotlineservers - 2 months in - they went above and beyond

$
0
0

Usually I don't write reviews this early in the game but after dealing with a few other providers lately I actually think @hotlineservers Brian deserves a call out.

I've been with @hotlineservers for 2 months now, I actually never heard of them until someone in this forum recommended them when I was looking for a VPS node in Miami, FL.

Before hotline I already had 2 other VPS providers that I had found on this forum as well but they sometimes took a full day to respond to a support ticket for a basic question or request like making debian 10 images available on reinstall page. I wasn't expecting much given that I was paying less than $20 a year to each of these providers.

Hotline support has been fantastic, speedy responses to all my questions and tickets even during weekends. I was trying to learn IPv6 traffic routing via wireguard and Brian even went above and beyond and stood up a spare 'test' node just for me to try to figure out the problem without affecting my primary VM.

A month after I started using hotline they even upgraded their servers to faster nodes and even my node was moved to an even faster host node. I wasn't expecting that since I had already paid for the full year and I guess most providers wouldn't have bothered.

After a few weeks of back and forth and testing, which needed Brian's help modifying some server side settings I was finally able to get IPv6 to be routed via wireguard without requiring a routed IPv6 segment. @hotlineservers even enabled the backup feature on my VM to automatically backup things in case they break later (feature wasn't enabled originally).

In closing if you're looking for an attentive and dedicated service provider you should take a look at Brian @hotlineservers


Initial provider reviews from PeerTube testing

$
0
0

As part of the Ops side of the my devops work on PeerTube I've setup several instances in the last few months at a variety of providers.
As part of my future plans I want to try setting it up on a small nat vps, so I need to get my post count and participation up, so here's my initial reviews.

  1. Home server on fiber with a dedicated VPN. Bad Idea, waste of money. Cost significantly more than a VPS for much worse performance. Do not recommend.

  2. Racknerd: first 2 I setup. Performance was exactly as promised, and have had excellent uptime. No bandwidth issues. One support issue that was completely my fault. I screwed up my initial attempts with offloading the video transcoding to a home computer instead of the VPS and pegged the VCPUs for a few days. Support cut me down to 1 cpu, and contacted me and when I was ignorant and snotty they educated me about what fair use means instead of just justifiably canceling my account. Mea culpa to anyone else on that box.

  3. LA vps: 3 of the Lunar new year specials have been perfect for my test instances. Great uptime and the unmetered bandwidth gives significant peace of mind. The reason they have been great for testing is that video transcoding is the biggest CPU hog for PeerTube, and the usual 60% CPU steal goes up to ~80 during transcoding. This was extending transcoding jobs so long it was causing video duplication problems. A perfect test case for developing Bash scripts offloading the transcoding to a home computer and now the servers are performing flawlessly.

  4. Letbox: got a 2tb storage server for testing offsite storage of video back catalogs for the low end instances with small amounts of local storage. Has performed perfectly in this roll so far with SSH rclone and Rsync. Further testing will push this harder.

  5. TNA hosting. Sure, this box has had uptime issues and I was unable get the offsite storage to work, I've chalked that up to it being OpenVZ instead of KVM or XEN. But the performance has been perfect. It manages 1080p livestreaming with simultaneous transcoding to 480, the 500 gigs of storage looks to be plenty for most creators. The uptime issue will be moot once PeerTube gets the video redundancy fixed.

  6. Reprise Hosting: $25 dollar dedicated server has performed perfectly. Used it to test hundreds of hours of transcoding and lbry node integration and other relatively cpu intensive tasks without having to worry about fair use or making my house any warmer.

  7. Servarica: Performing flawlessly so far. Moved Matt Christiansen's sited after the previous site wasn't up to the livestreaming demands. Has handled 2 hour+ streams transcoded in multiple resolutions with dozens of viewers so far at the unmetered 100mbit, look forward to seeing how it performs with the gigabit option enabled. Keeping hoping for the Mammoths to come back.

  8. Buyvm: Dedicated single CPU slice is working out well for a video serving instance. For livestreaming it taps out over 480p. Unmetered bandwidth and dedicated CPU mean not having to monitor as much as more limited servers which is nice. Price is significantly higher, but seems to be the consensus place to recommend to creators who may face push back with DDOS and false complaints.

Quick benchmark of Hetzner Cloud CPX21

$
0
0

Moving on from the deadpool that is hotlineservers, I decided to go set up camp for the AX41 since the space of LEPs that offer dedicated 5950x threads are now down to.... 0?

I went with the more isolated Helsinki node that may take up to 4-5 days to set up and put the 5€ shavings into a hetzner cloud. I've always heard good thinks about hetzner, now I'm starting to understand why. TBH I put hetzner off my radar many times because I always saw it as a place many LEPs go to kickstart their business in Europe, so I assumed it would be difficult for users like myself to navigate, it wasn't difficult- though my existing experiences with other LEPs definitely helped.

I'm ballparking, but I remember 3600x VPS geekbenchs would be around the same range. Sometimes they would be lower (down to 800-1000) if throttled or oversold. In fact cpuinfo shows it's max frequency at 4.3GHz, so at least something similar or equivalent. I miss 5950x geekbenches >1400 though.

Disk Speeds looks good except at 4k block size. What was suprising for me is how bad I expected the network speed to be, but it's pretty good for my purposes since it's not a heavy priority for me.

# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2021-06-05                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Wed 30 Jun 2021 08:29:12 PM CEST

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Processor  : AMD EPYC Processor
CPU cores  : 3 @ 2445.404 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM        : 3.7 GiB
Swap       : 0.0 KiB
Disk       : 75.0 GiB

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 81.83 MB/s   (20.4k) | 1.07 GB/s    (16.8k)
Write      | 82.05 MB/s   (20.5k) | 1.08 GB/s    (16.9k)
Total      | 163.88 MB/s  (40.9k) | 2.16 GB/s    (33.8k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 1.50 GB/s     (2.9k) | 1.65 GB/s     (1.6k)
Write      | 1.58 GB/s     (3.0k) | 1.76 GB/s     (1.7k)
Total      | 3.08 GB/s     (6.0k) | 3.41 GB/s     (3.3k)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed     
                |                           |                 |                
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 2.64 Gbits/sec  | 4.28 Gbits/sec 
Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | busy            | 2.19 Gbits/sec 
WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 3.00 Gbits/sec  | 2.21 Gbits/sec 
Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | 340 Mbits/sec   | 136 Mbits/sec  
Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.67 Gbits/sec  | 994 Mbits/sec  
Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 755 Mbits/sec   | 836 Mbits/sec  
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 786 Mbits/sec   | 456 Mbits/sec  
Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | 165 Mbits/sec   | 543 Mbits/sec  

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed     
                |                           |                 |                
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 2.76 Gbits/sec  | 3.24 Gbits/sec 
Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | busy            | 2.77 Gbits/sec 
WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 6.18 Gbits/sec  | busy           
Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.42 Gbits/sec  | 994 Mbits/sec  
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 957 Mbits/sec   | 597 Mbits/sec  

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 1126                          
Multi Core      | 3203                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/8627189


cpufrequtils 008: cpufreq-info (C) Dominik Brodowski 2004-2009
Report errors and bugs to cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, please.
analyzing CPU 0:
  no or unknown cpufreq driver is active on this CPU
  maximum transition latency: 4294.55 ms.
analyzing CPU 1:
  no or unknown cpufreq driver is active on this CPU
  maximum transition latency: 4294.55 ms.
analyzing CPU 2:
  no or unknown cpufreq driver is active on this CPU
  maximum transition latency: 4294.55 ms.

Dacentec 2021 Review

$
0
0

The analysis of a customer who has trusted Dacentec since 2019.

I trusted to take my equipment there in 2019, and I see that I made the right choice, almost everything there is very good.

Support:
It really is 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, with a well-trained and fast staff. (Robert <3)

Network:
Link reaching 900/800 Mbps on Speedtest and a great ping for South America (140ms for Brazil, 90ms for Colombia, 160ms for Argentina and Chile)

Hardware:
Finally, they added good hardware to stock and for a low price... SSD speeds are good

DDoS Protection:
DDoS is the biggest problem I have at Dacentec, I use BuyVM tunnels to solve it. If you're not a constant target of attacks, their protection should work well. (I would love to see path.net or Voxility in Dacentec by default)

Uptime:
Maintenances are announced 1-2 weeks in advance and I personally have never suffered from a power outage, as other topics say (or don't I remember?)

Benchmark (Supermicro 8-Bay 2xE5-2670v3 64GB 240GB SSD + 2x2TB SATA - NEW CONFIG):

# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2021-06-05                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

seg jul  5 00:40:56 -03 2021

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v3 @ 2.30GHz
CPU cores  : 48 @ 2389.570 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 125.5 GiB
Swap       : 4.0 GiB
Disk       : 3.8 TiB

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 8.03 MB/s     (2.0k) | 49.71 MB/s     (776)
Write      | 8.07 MB/s     (2.0k) | 50.04 MB/s     (782)
Total      | 16.10 MB/s    (4.0k) | 99.76 MB/s    (1.5k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 52.64 MB/s     (102) | 41.09 MB/s      (40)
Write      | 55.47 MB/s     (108) | 43.81 MB/s      (42)
Total      | 108.11 MB/s    (210) | 84.90 MB/s      (82)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed     
                |                           |                 |                
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 834 Mbits/sec   | 243 Mbits/sec  
Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 807 Mbits/sec   | busy           
WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 752 Mbits/sec   | 292 Mbits/sec  
Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | 628 Mbits/sec   | 176 Mbits/sec  
Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 919 Mbits/sec   | 879 Mbits/sec  
Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 696 Mbits/sec   | 792 Mbits/sec  
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 839 Mbits/sec   | 357 Mbits/sec  
Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | 756 Mbits/sec   | 220 Mbits/sec  

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 805                           
Multi Core      | 12425                         
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/8687521

What should I do if a business has no customer service phone number, no work order,

$
0
0

The mailbox on the official website also did not reply...

Now I am facing such a problem

The PayPal dispute period has passed

DediPath VPS Review - Exceptional support

$
0
0

I've been using a 6gb OVZ VPS from DediPath (@Ernie @BradyH ) for about a month now, and I am very pleased with them overall.
Here are the specs of the VM:
4 vCPUs (E5 2620 v2)
6GB RAM
Jacksonville location
OpenVZ
180GB SSD
1 Gbps port speed
7TB bandwidth
3 IPv4s

It costs 9.25 a month using the code from their memorial day promo, memorialday5021. For the price, I find these specs to be generous, especially the amount of SSD space, which is important to me. The CPU is a bit weaker than some budget providers out there, but it is fine and not oversold. The network has good upload speeds, but the download speeds are lower (this doesn't really matter to me).

As for uptime, it has been excellent. I have noticed that my VPS was restarted once, but other than that it has been without interruptions.

Here is the yabs.sh result for those interested (please note I have a web server and mysql in the background, so the benchmark may be worse than usual)

# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2021-06-05                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Wed Jul 21 20:19:18 BST 2021

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz
CPU cores  : 4 @ 2399.926 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 6.0 GiB
Swap       : 256.0 MiB
Disk       : 177.0 GiB

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 50.51 MB/s   (12.6k) | 151.33 MB/s   (2.3k)
Write      | 50.57 MB/s   (12.6k) | 152.13 MB/s   (2.3k)
Total      | 101.08 MB/s  (25.2k) | 303.47 MB/s   (4.7k)
           |                      |
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 195.92 MB/s    (382) | 220.38 MB/s    (215)
Write      | 206.33 MB/s    (402) | 235.06 MB/s    (229)
Total      | 402.25 MB/s    (784) | 455.45 MB/s    (444)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                |                           |                 |
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 782 Mbits/sec   | 77.1 Mbits/sec
Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 807 Mbits/sec   | busy
WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 769 Mbits/sec   | 89.3 Mbits/sec
Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | 315 Mbits/sec   | 52.9 Mbits/sec
Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 852 Mbits/sec   | 144 Mbits/sec
Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 860 Mbits/sec   | 137 Mbits/sec
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 812 Mbits/sec   | 111 Mbits/sec
Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | 631 Mbits/sec   | 28.9 Mbits/sec

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 483
Multi Core      | 1626
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/8925347

The download speeds were a bit lower than usual, but for me this is not a priority. The SSD is sufficiently fast for me. The weak link is probably the CPU, but for the price, it's hard to complain too much considering everything else you get.

But anyways, the support is what I found to be excellent, and here's my story:

Recently, I received a false abuse report from someone claiming to be Hetzner. Firstly, it was forwarded to me, without my service being suspended or terminated. Secondly, after confirming that the report was not valid, I contacted support, and they confirmed this and removed the report from my account in under 2 hours. I really appreciate their response in this situation.

Is Securebit a stupid service?

$
0
0

I have already paid for the service but could not get the service, the ticket did not continue to reply, filed a dispute with Paypal and did not admit the mistake, after I searched the Internet for Securebit's poor rating, did I fall into a trap.

I'm not from a wealthy area and I don't send money to people who don't provide services to me, and as long as I don't get the services described, I shouldn't pay for them, in my opinion.

ref:https://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=1827204
ref:https://www.trustpilot.com/review/www.securebit.ch

webhosting24 LET 10x10x10 Special 4 months Review

$
0
0

I got the special offer of webhosting24(LET 10x10x10) MUC in February.

Let's see how it is now

Here are the YABS results, it seems that it is good~

RNtT1K.png

Recently, webhosting 24 has added some new datacenters, combined with my experience, I think it should be good. The only downside is that the new vps has too little bandwidth


soyoustart.com dedicated server

$
0
0

greeting this is my first topic I would like to know the opinions of soyoustart.com someone here has servers with them as they forgive them for my English

web hosting

$
0
0

what are your good criteria for a good hosting company?

Nexeon - 1 Year of Colocation in Chicago

$
0
0

I realized just a bit ago that I've been with @Nexeon for a year, and I'd like to share my experience so far.

To start, the hardware I have here is a Supermicro 813MTQ, loaded with a Ryzen 7 3700x, X470D4U, 64GB DDR4, a Hyper M.2 card with 2x960GB Crucial MP510s, and 2x12TB WD Whitelabel drives. The expected power draw of this system is about 1-2A at 120V.

I chose the Chicago location due to the proximity to where I live (Michigan), as well as that most of my friends/people who will be playing on various gameservers will have great connectivity due to the central location - the building they are in is New Continuum, which appears to be a very good place to be and looks amazing from the outside.

From the start (back in June 2020), I was very impressed with Charles and his ability to respond quickly and address any concerns. I was also talking to Psychz and others, but they often had quite slow response times and wanted an arm and a leg for anything basic - Psychz even followed up MONTHS later saying I had an overdue invoice/bill for a service I never ordered. A bit of back and forth later, and I managed to get a really reasonable deal on my colocation of this 1U server, with a healthy bandwidth allowance (They offer a REALLY good deal right now for like $45/m, but being a slightly customized setup it's still a great deal for me). Support was also great, as there was an issue with the billing date and it double charged, they were right on it and corrected it immediately.

The shipping in process was painless, simply ship to the address they provided - I provided the tracking number/information to make sure they were aware the server was being shipped in. After receiving it, they set it up within a day or two and everything was perfect, including the extra IPMI port being setup and firewalled right away on request.

Network has been nothing less than fantastic. I have never had a networking blip, routing issue, ping spike, or any slowness at all on this server that I have noticed (no proper monitoring, sorry!) The blend is pretty good, I think it's Cogent, HE, and the other standard providers in Chicago.

Power has been stable as well, even with a single port I've had zero issues with any outages, restarts, or anything unplanned.

Overall, I'm incredibly happy with the service I've been paying for now for a year, and I look forward to many years of the same. If you're looking for something in Chicago and don't want to pay the top-tier prices, Nexeon is definitely one of my favorite places.

Issues with NexusBytes - 2 Month Review

$
0
0

No issues, solid as a rock. Signed up for NexusBytes.com backup storage account 2 months ago. Trouble free, fast, support is competent & friendly.

Nahian @seriesn helps me sleep at night knowing he's got my back-up.

MikePT posts another lifetime offer

$
0
0

With the issues with support (and the GDPR violation still on the main page), I have to admit I'm a little disappointed that @MikePT reneged on his promise to stop posting lifetime offers.

I don't think he'll deadpool, but I wouldn't hold my breath if all the money he makes is from lifetime offers.

/rant

People-friendly providers who also accept crypto

$
0
0

I've been thinking a while about posting this for the folk in need of providers to whom you can actually talk to, and who most importantly, also accept crypto.

I won't mention every provider I use (or have used), but I will try to mention a few, at the very least.

My best experience by far (human-to-human) has been with @Francisco of BuyVM.net, who has very graciously helped me with a very annoying problem one of the boxes faced. (IP kept getting unroutable, IIRC)

I haven't really had any type of abuse tickets or anything, but it says a lot when a provider doesn't mind helping you out considering the box cost something like $2.50/mo, and I did tell him I could just get another, and that it's not worth the trouble.

But he fixed it anyway.

I used his storage as well, and have recommended it to my friends, absolutely no problems whatsoever, and from what I'm told -- no issues with abuse tickets, either.

The most important thing to me is that you can talk to him as a human, and from the few times I had to contact their support. It was handled professionally every single time. Karen was a delight, and so was one of the tech guys, whose name sadly escapes me right now. But he helped me out. Otherwise, it was pretty much Francisco doing the support work.

All in all, BuyVM is probably the best hassle-free provider, as long as you're up front, they will be up front and understanding as well.

Now, as far as email goes. I've used @jar's MXRoute, and he has gone above and beyond, even provided support through some Slack-like channel thing. Considering I paid something like $30-50/y. I didn't expect it.

Down to earth, and a decent human being, much like Francisco.

Another one I tried was @seriesn's NexusBytes, and after a routine fraud check due to VPN, he was very up front and just said: Don't abuse the trust and get me in trouble. Shortly thereafter, he approved the order, and I paid him with crypto.

I can't speak much about the uptime (haven't tracked), but I had it for a year, and there were no issues whatsoever.

Cheers!

VPS providers, do you encrypt disks behind your kvm servers?

$
0
0

Hello all,

i've read a sad little story regarding Scaleway, they lost a SSD that was sold on "Leboncoin", a CraigList like website. A Youtuber found it and tried to find some contents, he identified the name of Scaleway. Scaleway did a communication about it. With a friend we are talking about responsabilities and how this could be handled so, we have a question.

As a VPS provider, you probably host or rent some dedicated. Do you encrypt disks on host side? Does this encryption can prevent a stollen disk to reveal its datas? If you don't do that, can you tell me if you have the choice or if it's not possible?

I understand that as a customer it's my responsabilities to encrypt my datas, even if my provider do it for me.

Thanks a lot for your feedbacks and informations, i'm really curious now ^^.


Anyone familiar or has Kamatera Instance

NickyZai NUC Dedicated Server Review: Fantastic Support, Exotic Location, Decent CPU, Cost-effective

$
0
0

2 weeks ago, Nicky posted an offer thread regarding their Asia Affordable Dedicated NUC Hosting - Starting from $17.50/month.

I am always on the hunt for an impossible low-cost dedicated server in Asia with an integrated GPU (< $25/m). While it is possible to get a similar price dedicated server easily in Europe/US, this price in Asia (even without iGPU) is very difficult. Needless to say, I bought one to test hence the review :D

During the process, I made some mistakes which resulted in needing him to reboot the machine physically for me multiple times. Despite me bothering him so many times, he responded to most of my messages within 2 hours. Thanks @nickyzai for the great support so far!

Some of you might be wondering did he hosts this in his basement? No, this is a proper Tier-3 datacenter (CX2, Cyberjaya, Malaysia) that peered with all major local ISPs (AS131310).

Personally, I feel it could be great to use it as a Plex/Transcoding server or even make it a simple 720p Cloud Gaming machine with its iGPU. The performance is not going to be great but still noticeable when doing 3D/Video Encoding compare to pure CPU only in VPS.


My Specs:

  • Intel NUC8i3BEH
  • Intel i3-8109U (2 Cores/4 Threads)
  • Integrated Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  • 8GB DDR4
  • 240GB M.2 SATA SSD
  • 20 x IPv4 NAT Ports + 1 x /64 IPv6
  • Unmetered @ 100Mbps
  • $17.50/month

Pros:

  • Budget dedicated server with iGPU (Good for running Plex/Transcoding, Emulator, simple 720p Cloud Gaming)
  • Exotic location (Asia)
  • Fantastic support
  • Decent Asia routing / latency
  • Highly Customisable (Can contact them for quotes on different configurations such as huge HDD for Plex)

Cons:

  • IPMI / remote console is request-basis (Not dedicated)
  • 100Mbps only (Upgradable)
  • Most parts of the IPv6 internet is still not routable (They are fixing this)
  • NAT IPv4 only

Looking Glass: http://lg.nickyzai.com:8082/

Full Disclosure: I only used their service for ~12 days, if something changed I will update this thread. (Most likely when I reached 30 and 90 days of using it)


Benchmarks / Network Test

dnstools.ws

| Location          | Latency |
| ----------------- | ------- |
| Perth, Australia  | 224.8ms |
| Sydney, Australia | 103.6ms |
| Austria           | 163ms   |
| Belgium           | 218.8ms |
| Bulgaria          | 193.8ms |
| Canada            | 253.4ms |
| Estonia           | 174ms   |
| Finland           | 174ms   |
| France            | 144ms   |
| Germany           | 203ms   |
| Italy             | 145ms   |
| Japan             | 82ms    |
| London            | 238ms   |
| Luxembourg        | 212.2ms |
| Norway            | 175.2ms |
| Netherlands       | 159.4ms |
| New Zealand       | 126ms   |
| Poland            | 193ms   |
| Romania           | 186.8ms |
| Russia            | 174ms   |
| Singapore         | 8.9ms   |
| South Africa      | 228ms   |
| Spain             | 151.6ms |
| Sweden            | 222.6ms |
| Taiwan            | 67.6ms  |
| Las Vegas, USA    | 192.2ms |
| New York, USA     | 218.4ms |

ping.pe

YABS

# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2021-06-05                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Mon 09 Aug 2021 11:25:16 PM +08

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Processor  : Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-8109U CPU @ 3.00GHz
CPU cores  : 4 @ 3600.479 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 7.6 GiB
Swap       : 977.0 MiB
Disk       : 78.8 GiB

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 83.15 MB/s   (20.7k) | 103.96 MB/s   (1.6k)
Write      | 83.37 MB/s   (20.8k) | 104.51 MB/s   (1.6k)
Total      | 166.53 MB/s  (41.6k) | 208.48 MB/s   (3.2k)
           |                      |
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 112.03 MB/s    (218) | 115.23 MB/s    (112)
Write      | 117.98 MB/s    (230) | 122.91 MB/s    (120)
Total      | 230.02 MB/s    (448) | 238.14 MB/s    (232)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                |                           |                 |
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 87.2 Mbits/sec  | 79.6 Mbits/sec
Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 83.7 Mbits/sec  | 28.1 Mbits/sec
WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 84.8 Mbits/sec  | 71.3 Mbits/sec
Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | 92.7 Mbits/sec  | 96.6 Mbits/sec
Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 80.6 Mbits/sec  | 42.9 Mbits/sec
Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | busy            | 17.9 Mbits/sec
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 38.5 Mbits/sec  | 50.3 Mbits/sec
Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | busy            | 7.35 Mbits/sec

Monster.bench

 ## Global Speedtest.net

 Location                       Upload           Download         Ping
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Nearby                         93.20 Mbit/s     96.30 Mbit/s     10.517 ms
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 USA, New York (Optimum)        38.34 Mbit/s     13.62 Mbit/s    219.692 ms
 USA, Chicago (Windstream)      48.07 Mbit/s     10.10 Mbit/s    201.535 ms
 USA, Dallas (Frontier)         56.33 Mbit/s     12.72 Mbit/s    213.270 ms
 USA, Miami (Sprint)            17.30 Mbit/s     13.09 Mbit/s    248.642 ms
 USA, Los Angeles (Windstream)  33.74 Mbit/s     8.93 Mbit/s     235.908 ms
 UK, London (toob Ltd)          59.68 Mbit/s     21.48 Mbit/s    160.669 ms
 France, Lyon (SFR)             37.95 Mbit/s     15.50 Mbit/s    166.447 ms
 Germany, Berlin (DNS:NET)      55.34 Mbit/s     18.62 Mbit/s    187.037 ms
 Spain, Madrid (MasMovil)       44.96 Mbit/s     16.28 Mbit/s    186.775 ms
 Italy, Rome (Unidata)          57.23 Mbit/s     33.75 Mbit/s    168.561 ms
 Russia, Moscow (Rostelecom)    35.66 Mbit/s     13.14 Mbit/s    208.792 ms
 Israel, Haifa (013Netvision)   52.64 Mbit/s     15.12 Mbit/s    227.756 ms
 India, New Delhi (Weebo)       87.20 Mbit/s     62.91 Mbit/s     75.196 ms
 Singapore (FirstMedia)         91.36 Mbit/s     76.62 Mbit/s     15.171 ms
 Japan, Tsukuba (SoftEther)     86.10 Mbit/s     60.72 Mbit/s     80.844 ms
 Australia, Sydney (Optus)      65.90 Mbit/s     48.56 Mbit/s    101.141 ms
 RSA, Randburg (Cool Ideas)     20.93 Mbit/s     25.37 Mbit/s    227.533 ms
 Brazil, Sao Paulo (Criare)     14.97 Mbit/s     7.46 Mbit/s     329.143 ms
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 ## Asia Speedtest.net

 Location                         Upload           Download         Ping
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Nearby                           92.84 Mbit/s     93.68 Mbit/s     7.926 ms
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 India, New Delhi (Weebo)         82.41 Mbit/s     58.25 Mbit/s     74.428 ms
 India, Mumbai (SevenStar)        81.80 Mbit/s     61.92 Mbit/s     65.530 ms
 India, Bengaluru (I-ON)          84.18 Mbit/s     60.89 Mbit/s     48.449 ms
 Sri Lanka, Colombo (Telecom PLC) 37.84 Mbit/s     46.57 Mbit/s     76.792 ms
 Pakistan, Islamabad (Telenor)    60.34 Mbit/s     37.63 Mbit/s    112.515 ms
 Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar (Mobicom)  62.86 Mbit/s     36.75 Mbit/s    122.529 ms
 Bangladesh, Dhaka (Skytel)       92.30 Mbit/s     65.80 Mbit/s     55.415 ms
 Bhutan, Thimphu (Bhutan Telecom) 82.48 Mbit/s     48.45 Mbit/s     81.621 ms
 Myanmar, Mandalay (Ooredoo)      79.30 Mbit/s     49.16 Mbit/s     91.252 ms
 Laos, Vientaine (Mangkone)       70.87 Mbit/s     57.78 Mbit/s     72.207 ms
 Thailand, Bangkok (CAT Telecom)  83.09 Mbit/s     44.23 Mbit/s     64.600 ms
 Cambodia, Phnom Penh (Smart)     8.45 Mbit/s      65.79 Mbit/s     50.022 ms
 Vietnam, Hanoi (Viettel)         97.78 Mbit/s     63.65 Mbit/s     61.256 ms
 Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur (Extreme) 87.45 Mbit/s     89.62 Mbit/s      1.409 ms
 Singapore (PT FirstMedia)        9.07 Mbit/s      73.23 Mbit/s     51.699 ms
 Indonesia, Jakarta (Desnet)      90.40 Mbit/s     92.52 Mbit/s     21.172 ms
 Philippines, Manila (Globe Tel)  39.80 Mbit/s     25.53 Mbit/s     53.107 ms
 Hong Kong (fdcservers)           88.70 Mbit/s     75.80 Mbit/s     44.296 ms
 Taiwan, Taipei (TAIFO)           31.16 Mbit/s     66.25 Mbit/s     64.172 ms
 Japan, Tsukuba (SoftEther)       77.43 Mbit/s     46.79 Mbit/s     81.267 ms
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dedicatserver.ro aka Astimp IT Solution SRL silently logging into the customer server

$
0
0

Creating a new thread because offer thread was set to sink

Dedicatserver.ro (@dedicatserver_ro) aka Astimp IT Solution SRL silently logging into the customer server without permission.

I don't have exact data on what commands were run on the server since it was cleared, however, they've forgotten to clean up the secure log file.

Even @cociu didn't do that.


What I should call this provider @FAT32 after doing this?

You always asked to be nice but come on this real utter shit and the provider
(@dedicatserver_ro) should be banned for doing such things.


**** systemd[***]: pam_unix(systemd-user:session): session opened for user root by (uid=0)
**** login[***]: pam_unix(login:session): session opened for user root by LOGIN(uid=0)
**** login[***]: ROOT LOGIN ON tty1

At first, I thought WTF why no IP with the last login, went checking secure log file, and surprise somebody logged in via root.

After that I realized this is only possible via OpenNebula console which I don't have access to because no console access is available in the client area:


I have kindly asked the provider to check OpenNebula logs (here) because you don't have a console in the panel to login in like that.

However, @dedicatserver_ro didn't deny it all and asked for IP later edited to ticket creation, there is no point to create a ticket because it's the provider's job to check who of the employees doing shady things.


Don't ever trust this provider even though it's cheap.

Actually, amazing thing that this @dedicatserver_ro was talking trash about @cociu but in reality, they are the bottom of it.

Enjoy!

Frantech solutions BEWARE

$
0
0

I am sure you have seen @Francisco and offers for BuyVM and BuyShared. Details about the Slice deals for storage etc. If you are like me you would be cautious trusting another LowEnd vendor. The chance that this is going to end up as another summer host is always high.

Buyer beware, this company is going to take your money for years to come. I started hosting a few services with them in 2016. Since I have added many more services and happily paid every invoice.

Well recently I purchased a new KVM server with the idea I was going to use this as a mail server for a project that required it's own dedicated instance for mail. I decided to try out and see if I can make this work with BuyVM. After installing the server software and configuring the domains I found I couldn't send or receive any mails to the new VM. I spent some time troubleshooting before opening a support ticket.

It's at this step that something very unexpected happened and caused me to write this post.

Ticket Opened regarding SMTP ports being blocked at: 08/10/2021 (15:47)
Ticket was updated at: 08/10/2021 (15:56)

That's right in less than 10 minutes they resolved my issue. BEWARE that this level of service, reliability, and support is not often found with smaller companies.

BEWARE that you will spend a lot of money with Frantech and @Francisco. Once you start you will see that they do exactly what they promise and make the best efforts to improve their services.

MXroute

$
0
0

I guess this is a review since jarland just killed my account because his "investigation" matched a Tor abuser to a single email address that a friend is using on my account.

The service was okay other than small issues over time that he resolved quickly. Doesn't matter though since his absolute pigheadedness led him to terminate my account last night without warning. Then after blocking my the email address that I was using to contact him (since he killed all of my other addresses), he terminated the chat/support account that was still active. I posted this email into the chat and he claimed that he "caught me".

In the chat. he said that he was glad I made it public, so I'm making it public here as well. I really don't know what's going on in his head, but maybe he'll sort it out and make it right.

Anyway, here it is:

Hello,

I'm checking to make sure that my email is arriving even if I can't access it.

Account login is mxroute.com@lurkmore.com


Account was terminated because you signed up for the new billing
portal as Tim Cook. I'm guessing it was you that did that to the micro
services before as well which caused us to receive abuse complaints
and caused Apple to block us for a bit.

--
MXroute Support


I haven't used the new billing portal, and I signed up using my name because otherwise I can't imagine I'd have been able to pay for my service with my credit card.

If the data on my lifetime package is missing, I won't be pleased.


Hey Richard,

Tor isn't a very good way to hide unless you take several steps prior
to the malicious actions to ensure that your computer doesn't also
perform background actions that help the recipient to cross reference
logs. For example, if you sign up as tcook@apple.com in the billing
portal and your computer connects to download email over POP3 at the
same time.

The service was refunded and terminated.

--
MXroute Support


My name isn't Ricahrd and I don't use Tor. I also don't use POP3. Why would I sign up a second time when I already have an account?

Once again, I have been unable to access my email accounts since about 8PM EST yesterday (TLS handshake failure. The server host name ("mail.lurkmore.com") does not match the certificate.) and I want confirmation that email is still being received until whatever backend issue is resolved. Webmail also just returns "Apache is functioning normally". Litetime account on Shadow server.


My final response will be the notes from my investigation into the
abuse of our systems. Note that some servers are on different
timezones than others, so gaps in time stamps may not be as
significant as they appear here.

https://clbin.com/I

--
MXroute Support


So your final response is that I access all of my mail through IMAP since it was created?

Did you seriously terminate a client's account because you matched up some Tor abuser to a single email account out of dozens on the same account? I'm pretty sure you know how Tor works, but I'll remind you that Tor IPs are random.

Do you understand what you've done? You have terminated a random client's account because his friend figured out how to configure his email account using Tor, on the email address that was created for him recently, on your service in which you allow Tor access.

I want confirmation that my email has been received this last 12 or so hours. Let me know when my account has been restored with all of its data.

I would absolutely hate to have to make this ordeal public due to pigheadedness, because I signed up thinking I would have good service from someone in the community, and while it has had its small issues, the issues were resolved quickly and the service has otherwise been great. The fact that you have migrated to a new system and probably spent a lot of time getting things fixed doesn't change that you have terminated a random client's account because your investigation into an abuser using Tor linked to a single legitimate email address on someone's account.


** Message blocked **

Your message to support@mxroute.com has been blocked. See technical details below for more information.

Has anyone used webhosting24?

$
0
0

Hi

I'm considering buying the 4 AMD Ryzen 9 3900X vCPU @ 3.80+ GHz from webhosting24. Just wondering if anyone has used them before? How was your experience with them? I can't seem to find many reviews online about them.

Also, any promo codes I can use?

Thanks

Review - Sonicfast.io

$
0
0

Sonicfast.io - would not recommend.

Signed up for a year last November because I liked their cheap promo price for a KVM, always-on 160 Gbps DDoS protection, and location (UK). They were featured on LEB more than once. https://lowendbox.com/tag/sonicfast/

Support and Documentation - Horrible. Ticket responses were dismissive and short. Literally short, 10 words or less. Examples of ticket responses:

  • "we only provide support for the paid version" in response to where I can find the free-tier DDoS management control panel advertised on their website.
  • "we didn't change anything in our firewall or network" in response to their network blocking all inbound traffic to a port that my VPS had been using.

In contrast, my BuyVM VPS had the same port blocked at the same time, since they probably used the same DDoS upstream provider. BuyVM quickly acknowledged the upstream provider had made a firewall change, re-opened the port, and gave me instructions on how to open/close the port myself. I'm not saying BuyVM is the gold standard, but my issue may have been easily fixable if it was met with a hint of empathy from Sonicfast.

Network - speed had been very good. The host was always online, and never saw any slow network.

Features - Bare minimum to poor, compared to other low-end providers. No SolusVM or similar management, despite their claim to have SolusVM. Maybe they do have Solus, but their support was no help (see above). Console access never worked for me (Java errors). Only control features available were reboot, reinstall, and a 24 hour mrtg bandwidth usage graph.

Uptime - Great! No unannounced downtime January to August, 2021. Maintenance was announced one week prior to my VPS being rebooted.

Too bad they could not muster decent support. Everything else had been nice. Perhaps adequate support would come on plans above the LowEnd tier, not sure, but other than having reliable DDoS protection at a low cost, I will leave feeling unappreciated and wanting to share my experience here, rooting for them to improve.


Looking for cheap VPS services

$
0
0

Hi

I need about 10-20 low powered VPS instances (slave nodes) that feeds data to my main master VPS.

Ideally, I'd like each instance to cost as little as possible so I can get as much data feed sources as possible. Each VPS instance must have an unique IP address.

Requirements:
Memory: 128 MB
Disk: 5gb
Bandwidth: 25GB/Month
OS: Ubuntu 20.04
Location: Japan or China

My main server is hosted using webhosting24, and their cheapest plan is the Tokyo Ryzen KVM 512MB NVMe, which is €1,25EUR/month. If I buy 10 of them, it'll cost 12.5 EUR/month. Anyone know where I can get anything cheaper?

Thanks

Racknerd VPS Review

MXroute review (via Nexusbytes)

$
0
0

4,5/5 :star:
It's pretty good, but I'd like to suggest an improvement.
There is a problem that I'd like to point out are:

  1. Checking if the domain is working, and all records are set properly every now and then (2 hours).

I've gotten my domain blocked multiple times because I forgot to verify WHOIS details (dumb me). Subsequently, I've stopped receiving emails, for like a good week. In this time I have missed many emails, thankfully I don't really care about those emails. Thus I would love if @jar implemented some kind of monitoring script that would check if the domains are properly configured and working. If not than, maybe send an SMS to the owner or an emergency email address (like @gmail.com).

Otherwise, email is working amazingly, had zero downtime, no problems with receiving email (except the one described above).

Thank you @jar for providing an amazing service, and thank you @seriesn for reselling his service at a cheaper price.

PHP/MySQL CPU performance of shared hosting

$
0
0

One of my website is on a shared hosting. Installed the PHP/MySQL CPU performance statistics plugin and tested the performance of the web hosting provider. This is the result from the plugin test.
https://imgur.com/a/BrhpWAL

From the test above, what do you think about the performance of my shared hosting plan/provider?

Is this plugin test ideal to assess the performance of a hosting plan? What other plugins can I use to test performance of a web hosting shared package of two or more providers that will help to choose the best shared hosting provider?

Public DNS Server List | feedback needed

Asked a question to evolution-host, they didn't reply for a month, But the recharge question respond

$
0
0

I have a machine, Status: Network Suspended. But I only use 1% of traffic.

Asked the official reason? There has been no reply for a month. What should I do?

I commented on Twitter and did not reply to me, they still update Twitter every day

I told them that the recharge failed, and they responded to me within an hour.

My important data is still in this machine, I can't contact the official. The machine will expire in 2026...

@EvolutionHost Last Active August 5

$
0
0

From May to September, there was still no reply.

It is said that there is only one possibility of banned machines being abused by me,

I have been asking for evidence for a few months, but there is no reply.

Today I complained to other manufacturers about their user abuse,

They will ask me to show evidence and notify the other party to make corrections.
image.png

@EvolutionHost, you guys have no evidence, no notice, and I actively communicated and did not reply. A sharp contrast.






Latest Images